Synchronisation and stability in river metapopulation networks.

Spatial structure in landscapes impacts population stability. Two linked components of stability have large consequences for persistence: first, statistical stability as the lack of temporal fluctuations; second, synchronisation as an aspect of dynamic stability, which erodes metapopulation rescue effects. Here, we determine the influence of river network structure on the stability of riverine metapopulations. We introduce an approach that converts river networks to metapopulation networks, and analytically show how fluctuation magnitude is influenced by interaction structure. We show that river metapopulation complexity (in terms of branching prevalence) has nonlinear dampening effects on population fluctuations, and can also buffer against synchronisation. We conclude by showing that river transects generally increase synchronisation, while the spatial scale of interaction has nonlinear effects on synchronised dynamics. Our results indicate that this dual stability - conferred by fluctuation and synchronisation dampening - emerges from interaction structure in rivers, and this may strongly influence the persistence of river metapopulations.

[1]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[2]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Analytical search for bifurcation surfaces in parameter space , 2004 .

[3]  Robert S. Schick,et al.  Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network , 2007 .

[4]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Turing patterns in network-organized activator–inhibitor systems , 2008, 0807.1230.

[5]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  E. Ranta,et al.  Synchronous dynamics and rates of extinction in spatially structured populations , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth , 2011, Science.

[9]  A. Hastings,et al.  Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics , 2008, Nature.

[10]  D. Grünbaum The logic of ecological patchiness , 2012, Interface Focus.

[11]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Modelling dendritic ecological networks in space: an integrated network perspective. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[12]  D. Doak,et al.  The Statistical Inevitability of Stability‐Diversity Relationships in Community Ecology , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Self‐organized river basin landscapes: Fractal and multifractal characteristics , 1994 .

[14]  D. Rothman,et al.  Ramification of stream networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. E. Cowley,et al.  Fish assemblages and seasonal movements of fish in irrigation canals and river reaches of the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico (USA) , 2007 .

[16]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Stability and Diversity of Ecosystems , 2007, Science.

[17]  C. Townsend,et al.  Impacts of freshwater invaders at different levels of ecological organisation, with emphasis on salmonids and ecosystem consequences , 2003 .

[18]  Andrew L Jackson,et al.  On the dimensionality of ecological stability. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[19]  Dong Liang,et al.  The Laplacian Spread of a Tree , 2008, Discret. Math. Theor. Comput. Sci..

[20]  H. Bethe Statistical Theory of Superlattices , 1935 .

[21]  Si Tang,et al.  Stability criteria for complex ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[22]  D. Schindler,et al.  Centennial-scale fluctuations and regional complexity characterize Pacific salmon population dynamics over the past five centuries , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[24]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[25]  D. Lytle,et al.  Population genetic structure reveals terrestrial affinities for a headwater stream insect , 2007 .

[26]  D. Earn,et al.  Coherence and conservation. , 2000, Science.

[27]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[28]  W. Fagan CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[29]  Mauricio Barahona,et al.  Synchronization in small-world systems. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[30]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  Synchronization and portfolio performance of threatened salmon , 2010 .

[31]  M. D. de Aguiar,et al.  Turing patterns and apparent competition in predator-prey food webs on networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[33]  Kim Cuddington,et al.  Predator‐Prey Dynamics and Movement in Fractal Environments , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[34]  P. Raven,et al.  Recovery by riffle macroinvertebrates in a river after a major accidental spillage of chlorpyrifos. , 1989, Environmental pollution.

[35]  M. Mangel The Theoretical Biologist's Toolbox: Applications of stochastic population dynamics to ecology, evolution, and biodemography , 2006 .

[36]  Robert M. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[37]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1994 .

[38]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Critical threshold effects of benthiscape structure on stream herbivore movement , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  Probabilistic patterns of interaction: the effects of link-strength variability on food web structure , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[40]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks , 2008 .

[41]  D. Auerbach,et al.  Metacommunity theory as a multispecies, multiscale framework for studying the influence of river network structure on riverine communities and ecosystems , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[42]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin , 2008, Nature.

[43]  J. Kurths,et al.  Network synchronization, diffusion, and the paradox of heterogeneity. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Generalized modeling of ecological population dynamics , 2010, Theoretical Ecology.

[45]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species , 2010, Nature.

[46]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  How restructuring river connectivity changes freshwater fish biodiversity and biogeography , 2011 .

[47]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. , 2007 .

[48]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  E. Grant Structural complexity, movement bias, and metapopulation extinction risk in dendritic ecological networks , 2011 .

[50]  F. He,et al.  Understanding diversity–stability relationships: towards a unified model of portfolio effects , 2012, Ecology letters.