Exploring middle school students' interests in computationally intensive science careers: The CISCI instrument validation and intervention

[1]  A. Rachmatullah,et al.  Toward More Generalizable CS and CT Instruments: Examining the Interaction of Country and Gender at the Middle Grades Level , 2022, ITiCSE.

[2]  E. Wiebe,et al.  Building a computational model of food webs: Impacts on middle school students' computational and systems thinking skills , 2021, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[3]  K. Mulvey,et al.  Understanding science career aspirations: Factors predicting future science task value , 2021 .

[4]  Kevser Hava,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking Skills and their STEM Career Interest and Attitudes Toward Inquiry , 2021 .

[5]  G. Adams,et al.  A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender Gaps in STEM Participation , 2020, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  James C. Lester,et al.  Development and validation of the Computer Science Attitudes Scale for middle school students (MG-CS attitudes) , 2020, Computers in Human Behavior Reports.

[7]  Sarah A. Roller,et al.  Development and Initial Validation of the Student Interest and Choice in STEM (SIC-STEM) Survey 2.0 Instrument for Assessment of the Social Cognitive Career Theory Constructs , 2020 .

[8]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  The Relationship of Gender, Experiential, and Psychological Factors to Achievement in Computer Science , 2020, ITiCSE.

[9]  M. Hatzigianni,et al.  Understanding K-12 STEM Education: a Framework for Developing STEM Literacy , 2020 .

[10]  Jean Salac,et al.  Comprehending Code: Understanding the Relationship between Reading and Math Proficiency, and 4th-Grade CS Learning Outcomes , 2020, SIGCSE.

[11]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Exploring Force and Motion Concepts in Middle Grades Using Computational Modeling: a Classroom Intervention Study , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[12]  Y. Chou,et al.  Creative Drama In Science education: The Effects on Situational Interest, Career Interest, and Science-Related Attitudes of Science Majors and Non-Science Majors , 2020 .

[13]  Meredith W. Kier,et al.  Eliciting Students’ Voices Through STEM Career Explorations , 2020 .

[14]  PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) , 2019, PISA.

[15]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Learning natural selection through computational thinking: Unplugged design of algorithmic explanations , 2019, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[16]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  Development of a Lean Computational Thinking Abilities Assessment for Middle Grades Students , 2019, SIGCSE.

[17]  Sherri L. Turner,et al.  SES, Gender, and STEM Career Interests, Goals, and Actions: A Test of SCCT , 2019 .

[18]  R. Koul,et al.  Transnational Examination of STEM Education , 2018 .

[19]  Isla Ross,et al.  Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Why Students Choose to Study Computer Science , 2018, ICER.

[20]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  The Relationship of STEM Attitudes and Career Interest , 2018, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

[21]  M. Ha,et al.  The Secondary-Student Science Learning Motivation in Korea and Indonesia , 2018 .

[22]  C. Schunn,et al.  When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences , 2018 .

[23]  O. Bulut,et al.  Handbook of Educational Measurement and Psychometrics Using R , 2018 .

[24]  F. Kares,et al.  Staff matter: Gender differences in science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) career interest development in adolescent youth , 2018, Applied developmental science.

[25]  M. Ha,et al.  Career motivation of secondary students in STEM: a cross-cultural study between Korea and Indonesia , 2018 .

[26]  V. Shute,et al.  Demystifying computational thinking , 2017 .

[27]  Marcos Romn-Gonzlez,et al.  Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Aditi Wagh,et al.  Bridging inquiry‐based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry , 2017 .

[29]  T. Andre,et al.  Factors Contributing to Lifelong Science Learning: Amateur Astronomers and Birders. , 2017 .

[30]  William J. Boone,et al.  Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How? , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[31]  Olatokunbo S. Fashola,et al.  Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills , 2016 .

[32]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms , 2016 .

[33]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals , 2015 .

[34]  Amy Pallant,et al.  Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models , 2015 .

[35]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Measure of Student Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM) , 2015 .

[36]  Meredith W. Kier,et al.  The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS) , 2014 .

[37]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  The Association Between Science Summer Camps and Career Interest in Science and Engineering , 2014 .

[38]  A. Scally,et al.  Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio , 2014 .

[39]  Melissa S. Yale,et al.  Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences , 2013 .

[40]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Factors that Affect the Physical Science Career Interest of Female Students: Testing Five Common Hypotheses. , 2013 .

[41]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Science Aspirations, Capital, and Family Habitus , 2012 .

[42]  Gregory C. Wolniak,et al.  The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students , 2012 .

[43]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies , 2012 .

[44]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM , 2012 .

[45]  Z. Bar-Joseph,et al.  Algorithms in nature: the convergence of systems biology and computational thinking , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[46]  T. Schmitt.  Current Methodological Considerations in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2011 .

[47]  Drew A. Linzer,et al.  poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis , 2011 .

[48]  Steven J. Osterlind,et al.  Differential Item Functioning , 2009, Item Response Theory.

[49]  Eun-Seok Cha,et al.  Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[50]  J. Raubenheimer.  AN ITEM SELECTION PROCEDURE TO MAXIMISE SCALE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY , 2004 .

[51]  Michael E. Woolley,et al.  Cognitive Pretesting and the Developmental Validity of Child Self-Report Instruments: Theory and Applications , 2004, Research on social work practice.

[52]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  MythematiCS: in praise of storytelling in the teaching of computer science and math , 2003, SGCS.

[53]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[54]  John Settlage,et al.  Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools , 2002 .

[55]  M. Martinez-pons,et al.  Mathematics Self-Efficacy, Ethnic Identity, Gender, and Career Interests Related to Mathematics and Science , 1999 .

[56]  A. Bandura,et al.  The anatomy of stages of change. , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[57]  Nadya A. Fouad,et al.  A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. , 1996 .

[58]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[59]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. , 1986 .

[60]  C. H. Lawshe.  A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[61]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[62]  Brian E. Gravel,et al.  Exploring Shifts in Middle School Learners’ Modeling Activity While Generating Drawings, Animations, and Computational Simulations of Molecular Diffusion , 2014, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[63]  Sheila M. Smith.  The Role of Social Cognitive Career Theory in Information Technology Based Academic Performance. , 2002 .

[64]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. , 2000 .

[65]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[66]  Richard M. Smith.  A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch measurement , 1996 .

[67]  B. Wright.  Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .