Competition and Productivity in Mixture of Oats and Wheat

The research assesses the productivity of mixture of oats (Avena saliva) and wheat (Triticum aestivum), and compares two different approaches used in plant competition studies: replacement (substitutive) designs and additive designs. The experiment was carried out on sandy loam soil at the Experimental Station of Agricultural University of Wroclaw (Poland). Oats and wheat were grown for grain as sole crops and in 1: 1 replacement mixtures at three rates of seeding: 150, 300 and 600 viable seeds m -2 . These designs allowed mixtures seeded at a rate of 300 and 600 seeds m -2 to be analysed according to either a replacement or an additive approach. In 1999, pure stand wheat and oats-wheat mixture yielded significantly more grain than oats grown alone but in 2000 there was no difference in yield. Wheat outcompeted oats in mixture but the relative competitive ability of the two species changed little with increasing seeding density. Relative yield total (RYT) for grain was significantly > 1.0 (RYT = 1.07) in 1999 for the lowest seeding density, showing partial complementarity in use of limiting resources by the species in mixture. Based on grain yields, the results obtained from substitutive and additive mixtures were similar with respect to the relative yields and relative competitive ability of the two species concerned.

[1]  S. Hamilton Replacement and additive designs for plant competition studies. , 1994 .

[2]  V. Baron,et al.  Post-flowering forage potential of spring and winter cereal mixtures , 1992 .

[3]  Timothy G. Howard The relationship of total and per‐gram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials , 2001 .

[4]  P. Juskiw,et al.  Competitive Ability in Mixtures of Small Grain Cereals , 2000 .

[5]  J. Connolly [Effects of different cropping modes on crop root growth, yield, and rhizosphere soil microbes' number]. , 1986 .

[6]  C.J.T. Spitters,et al.  An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects , 1983 .

[7]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Interspecific Competition in Plants: How Well Do Current Methods Answer Fundamental Questions? , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[8]  R. W. Snaydon,et al.  Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system , 1997, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[9]  John Vandermeer,et al.  The Ecology of Intercropping by John H. Vandermeer , 1989 .

[10]  P. Banik,et al.  Evaluation of mustard (Brassica compestris Var. Toria) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series systems. , 2000 .

[11]  R. Cousens,et al.  Dynamics of Competition between Wheat and Oat , 2003 .

[12]  P. Juskiw,et al.  Annual forage production from spring-planted winter cereal monocrops and mixtures with spring barley , 1999 .

[13]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Competition and relative yield: estimation and interpretation at different densities and under various nutrient concentrations using Silybum marianum and Cirsium vulgare , 1988 .

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[15]  S. Sarandón,et al.  Mixture of Cultivars - Pilot Field Trial of An Ecological Alternative to Improve Production Or Quality of Wheat (Triticum-Aestivum) , 1995 .

[16]  E. Gallandt,et al.  Diallel Analysis of Cultivar Mixtures in Winter Wheat , 2001 .

[17]  W. Hargrove,et al.  Optimizing row spacing and seeding rate for soft red winter wheat , 1988 .

[18]  R. Cousens,et al.  Density dependence of replacement series experiments , 1993 .

[19]  J. Connolly,et al.  Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants , 1999 .

[20]  Biancardi,et al.  Competition between sugarbeet and Sinapis arvensis and Chenopodium album, as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization , 1999 .

[21]  R. Mead,et al.  The Concept of a ‘Land Equivalent Ratio’ and Advantages in Yields from Intercropping , 1980, Experimental Agriculture.

[22]  P. Jedel,et al.  Forage potential of Wapiti triticale mixtures in central Alberta , 1994 .

[23]  R. González Ponce,et al.  Competition between barley and Lolium rigidum for nitrate , 1998 .

[24]  M. Altieri The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems , 1999 .

[25]  P. Jolliffe The replacement series , 2000 .

[26]  R. Karjalainen,et al.  Influence of Barley Scald Disease on Yield and Competition in Barley‐Oat Mixtures , 1993 .

[27]  B. R. Taylor Studies on a barley-oats mixture , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[28]  R. Snaydon Replacement or additive designs for competition studies , 1991 .

[29]  E. Satorre,et al.  Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data: modifications and interpretation , 1989 .

[30]  Charles Francis,et al.  Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems , 1989 .

[31]  W. Aufhammer,et al.  Effekte der Sorten‐ (Weizen)und der Arten‐ (Weizen, Roggen) Mischung auf die Ertragsleistung krankheitsfreier Bestände , 1989 .

[32]  R. Phipps,et al.  Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK , 1998 .

[33]  D. Pageau RENDEMENT DE DIFFÉRENTS MÉLANGES D’ORGE (Hordeum vulgare L.) ET D’AVOINE (Avenau sativa L.) ET PRODUCTIVITÉ DE CHACUNE DES ESPÈCES , 1990 .

[34]  R. Rauber,et al.  Konkurrenz und Ertragsvorteile in Gemengen aus Erbsen (Pisum sativum L.) und Hafer (Avena sativa L.) , 2000 .

[35]  P. A. Burnett,et al.  Yield, quality and stress tolerance of barley mixtures in central Alberta , 1998 .

[36]  B. Trenbath,et al.  Biomass Productivity of Mixtures , 1974 .

[37]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Competition along a nutrient gradient: A case study with Daucus carota and Chenopodium album , 2000, Ecological Research.

[38]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Are mixed populations of plant species more productive than pure stands , 1997 .

[39]  T. Semere,et al.  The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and pea , 2001 .