Computer analysis of portal hemodynamics after small-diameter portacaval H-grafts: the theoretical basis for partial shunting.

We have previously reported on the clinical results of partial shunting using small-diameter portacaval H-grafts. In this study, we defined the theoretical basis for partial shunting using the Wheatstone bridge model of the splanchnic circulation. The model was modified to include a variable resistance for a portacaval shunt and was programmed as a computer simulation. We calculated portal flow as a function of shunt resistance to determine the resistance necessary to maintain prograde portal flow in patients with portal hypertension. The resistance of 8- and 10-mm portacaval H-grafts, as positioned clinically, was determined using a laboratory apparatus. The experimentally derived values for resistance were inserted into the graph of portal flow predicted by the computer program. Portacaval H-grafts 8 mm in diameter should produce prograde portal flow, 10-mm H-grafts should be borderline, and shunts larger than 10 mm should routinely result in reversed flow. These predictions were confirmed by clinical observations in 29 patients undergoing portacaval H-grafts.

[1]  E B Rypins,et al.  A Systematic Appraisal of Portacaval H‐Graft Diameters: Clinical and Hemodynamic Perspectives , 1986, Annals of surgery.

[2]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Quantitation of portasystemic shunting from the splenic and mesenteric beds in alcoholic liver disease. , 1972, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  W. Millikan,et al.  The Metabolic Basis of Portasystemic Encephalopathy and the Effect of Selective vs Nonselective Shunts , 1974, Annals of surgery.

[4]  R. M. Conroy,et al.  Portacaval H-graft: relationships of shunt diameter, portal flow patterns and encephalopathy. , 1983, Annals of Surgery.

[5]  H. Bismuth,et al.  Portal‐Systemic Shunt in Hepatic Cirrhosis: Does the Type of Shunt Decisively Influence the Clinical Result? , 1974, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Zihni Erençin.  BEITRAG ZUR LEBERZIRKULATION , 1952 .

[7]  R. V. Reddy,et al.  The hemodynamics of portal hypertension revisited: determinants and significance of occluded portal pressures. , 1975, Surgery.

[8]  W. Millikan,et al.  Angiography in portal hypertension: clinical significance in surgery. , 1980, American journal of surgery.

[9]  R. M. Conroy,et al.  Predictability and Maintenance of Portal Flow Patterns After Small‐Diameter Portacaval H‐Grafts in Man , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[10]  J. Jelínek,et al.  Quantitative intraoperative assessment of portacaval shunt: theoretical study. , 1981, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  D. S. Lordahl,et al.  Modern Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. , 1968 .