Employee Collaboration, Learning Orientation, and New Service Development Performance

Businesses rely on knowledge interfaces to gather and integrate knowledge that drives innovation and builds competitive advantage. But key knowledge interfaces such as cross-functional teams (CFTs), frontline employees (FLEs), and learning orientation have not shown consistent effects on innovation outcomes in prior research. This study addresses that problem by testing a mediation model that extends the service-dominant logic service innovation framework developed by Ordanini and Parasuraman. Based on analyses of 160 new service development (NSD) projects, the authors find that CFTs, FLEs, and learning orientation consistently influence NSD sales and process efficiency outcomes when they first create a service having (1) superior attributes and expert frontline employee service delivery (service marketability) and/or (2) a well-targeted launch with formal promotion to internal and external markets (launch effectiveness). Those NSD project characteristics in turn yield favorable new service performance results. Specifically, service marketability and launch effectiveness mediate the influence of CFTs on NSD outcomes. Launch effectiveness mediates the influence of learning orientation, and service marketability mediates the impact of FLEs. In ranking the organizational resources, the study finds that CFTs and learning orientation have greater effect on NSD sales performance than do FLEs. The results highlight the importance of aligning CFTs, FLEs, and learning orientation with NSD project characteristics in order to maximize sales performance and process efficiency.

[1]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Developing Customer Service Innovations for Service Employees: The Effects of NSD Characteristics on Internal Innovation Magnitude , 2011 .

[2]  R. Fisk,et al.  Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting , 2011 .

[3]  Siegfried Macho,et al.  Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: the phantom model approach. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[4]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service Innovation Viewed Through a Service-Dominant Logic Lens: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis , 2011 .

[5]  David A. Griffith,et al.  Synergistic effects of operant knowledge resources , 2010 .

[6]  Horace L. Melton,et al.  Customer and Frontline Employee Influence on New Service Development Performance , 2010 .

[7]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Kayhan Tajeddini.  The Impact of Learning Orientation on NSD and Hotel Performance: Evidence from the Hotel Industry in Iran , 2009 .

[9]  H. Droege,et al.  Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways , 2009 .

[10]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[11]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  A Resource‐Process Framework of New Service Development , 2007 .

[12]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[13]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings , 2008 .

[14]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[15]  J. Covin,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective* , 2008 .

[16]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[17]  Ann Ledwith,et al.  Product launch, product advantage and market orientation in SMEs , 2008 .

[18]  C. Moorman,et al.  Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines , 2008 .

[19]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Does Market Orientation Facilitate Balanced Innovation Programs? An Organizational Learning Perspective , 2007 .

[20]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[21]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[22]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic , 2007 .

[23]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in hospitals: a survey of the literature , 2007, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[24]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  H. Keskin.  Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Innovation Capabilities in SMEs: An extended Model , 2006 .

[26]  Peter Jones,et al.  Identifying determinants of success in development of new high‐contact services , 2006 .

[27]  Sergios Dimitriadis,et al.  Managing the new service development process: towards a systemic model , 2005 .

[28]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[29]  P. Vermeulen,et al.  Organizing successful new service development: a literature review , 2003 .

[30]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[32]  I. Alam.  An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development , 2002 .

[33]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Product Innovation: Delving into the Organization's Black Box , 2002 .

[34]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[35]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[36]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[37]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[38]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[40]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Antecedents of New Service Development Effectiveness , 2000 .

[41]  R. B. Chase,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the New Service Development Process: Integrating Service Innovation and Service Design , 2000 .

[42]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[43]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[44]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[45]  R. Grover,et al.  From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[46]  A. Johne,et al.  New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography , 1998 .

[47]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior , 1997 .

[48]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[49]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia , 1996 .

[50]  D. A. Horne,et al.  Level of success inputs for service innovations in the same firm , 1995 .

[51]  D. W. Calvin.  Thinking Small in a Large Company , 1995 .

[52]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Developing New Products On Time, In Time , 1995 .

[53]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[55]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[56]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Success Factors in Developing New Business Services , 1991 .

[57]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[58]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[59]  E. Larson,et al.  Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights , 1987 .

[60]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  Harsharanjeet S. Jagpal.  Multicollinearity in Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables , 1982 .

[62]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[63]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .