Angiographic and clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions.

AIMS Restenosis and bifurcated lesions represent technically challenging lesions for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Data regarding procedural and clinical outcome of re-PCI for restenosis of stented bifurcated lesions are lacking. Our aims were to evaluate angiographic and procedural results and one-year clinical outcome of PCI for restenosis of stented bifurcated lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for restenosis of one bifurcated lesion previously treated by stent implantation at our centre entered the study. The primary endpoint was angiographic and procedural success, defined as final residual stenosis ≤30% in the main vessel with TIMI 3 flow in both MV and side branch, and stenosis ≤50% in the SB without death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation during hospitalisation. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at one-year clinical follow-up. The study population included 64 patients treated by PCI on a single restenotic bifurcated lesion. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in 61 cases (95.3%) whereas the three cases of failure were due to SB residual stenosis >50%. At one year, MACE rate was 18.7% (12/64) with rates of cardiac death, MI and TVR of 1.6% (1/64), 6.2% (4/64) and 18.7% (12/64), respectively. No cases of stent thrombosis occurred. Patients treated by a single drug-eluting stent (DES) on main vessel (MV) had a significant lower rate of MACE at one year as compared to patients treated with balloon only PCI or by double-stenting technique or with a BMS, irrespective of the strategy adopted: 4/37 (10.8%) vs. 8/27 (29.6%); p=0.04. CONCLUSIONS PCI in restenotic bifurcated lesions can be a good treatment option with high rates of angiographic and procedural success and an acceptable rate of long-term MACE. The use of a single DES implantation may be a promising strategy as it is associated with lower rates of MACE in the long term.

[1]  A. Baumbach,et al.  Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New, and Evolving Strategies , 2010, Circulation.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Myocardial infarction adjudication in contemporary all-comer stent trials: balancing sensitivity and specificity. Addendum to the historical MI definitions used in stent studies. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Íñiguez,et al.  Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Böhm,et al.  Two year follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter , 2008, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[5]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis of the unprotected left main coronary artery. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Modified T‐stenting with intentional protrusion of the side‐branch stent within the main vessel stent to ensure ostial coverage and facilitate final kissing balloon: The T‐stenting and small protrusion technique (TAP‐stenting). Report of bench testing and first clinical Italian‐Korean two‐centre exp , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  Hadar Marom,et al.  Bifurcation lesions in the coronary arteries: early experience with a novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis before and after stenting. , 2007, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[9]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of bare-metal in-stent restenosis: long-term clinical follow up. , 2007, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[10]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease Trial (SCANDSTENT). , 2006, American heart journal.

[12]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  P. Brunel,et al.  Provisional T‐stenting and kissing balloon in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: Results of the French multicenter “TULIPE” study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  C. Macaya,et al.  A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[16]  W. Bamlet,et al.  Nine-month outcome of patients treated by percutaneous coronary interventions for bifurcation lesions in the recent era: a report from the Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  S. Silber,et al.  Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT). , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Randomized Study to Evaluate Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Implanted at Coronary Bifurcation Lesions , 2004, Circulation.

[20]  K. Kent,et al.  Five-Year Follow-Up After Intracoronary Gamma Radiation Therapy for In-Stent Restenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[21]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World”: The R apamycin-E luting S tent E valuated A t R otterdam C ardiology H ospital (RESEARCH) Registry , 2004, Circulation.

[22]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Parallel hierarchy of scientific studies in cardiovascular medicine. , 2003, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[23]  C. Di Mario,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Modified T-Stenting Technique With Crushing for Bifurcation Lesions: Immediate Results and 30-Day Outcome , 2003 .

[24]  I. Crocker,et al.  Treatment of bifurcation in-stent restenotic lesions with beta radiation using strontium 90 and sequential positioning pullback technique: procedural details and clinical outcomes. , 2003, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[25]  Muzaffer Degertekin,et al.  TAXUS III Trial: In-Stent Restenosis Treated With Stent-Based Delivery of Paclitaxel Incorporated in a Slow-Release Polymer Formulation , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  C. Frost,et al.  Outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis; results from a systematic review using meta-analysis techniques. , 2003, European heart journal.

[27]  S. Silber,et al.  Rotational Atherectomy Does Not Reduce Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis Results of the Angioplasty Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Treatment of Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Trial (ARTIST) , 2002 .

[28]  J. Suárez de Lezo,et al.  A stepwise strategy for the stent treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[29]  K. Detre,et al.  Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  P. Rentrop,et al.  Clinical and angiographic outcome in the laser angioplasty for restenotic stents (LARS) multicenter registry , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[31]  J. Tobis,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent--immediate and follow-up results. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  P. Guyon,et al.  Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the "culotte" technique. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  C. Lazzam,et al.  Coronary 'Y' stenting: a technique for angioplasty of bifurcation stenoses. , 1996, The Canadian journal of cardiology.