A methodological approach for deep learning to distinguish between meningiomas and gliomas on canine MR-images

BackgroundDistinguishing between meningeal-based and intra-axial lesions by means of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings may occasionally be challenging. Meningiomas and gliomas account for most of the total primary brain neoplasms in dogs, and differentiating between these two forms is mandatory in choosing the correct therapy. The aims of the present study are: 1) to determine the accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN, GoogleNet) in discriminating between meningiomas and gliomas in pre- and post-contrast T1 images and T2 images; 2) to develop an image classifier, based on the combination of CNN and MRI sequence displaying the highest accuracy, to predict whether a lesion is a meningioma or a glioma.ResultsEighty cases with a final diagnosis of meningioma (n = 56) and glioma (n = 24) from two different institutions were included in the study. A pre-trained CNN was retrained on our data through a process called transfer learning. To evaluate CNN accuracy in the different imaging sequences, the dataset was divided into a training, a validation and a test set. The accuracy of the CNN was calculated on the test set. The combination between post-contrast T1 images and CNN was chosen in developing the image classifier (trCNN). Ten images from challenging cases were excluded from the database in order to test trCNN accuracy; the trCNN was trained on the remainder of the dataset of post-contrast T1 images, and correctly classified all the selected images. To compensate for the imbalance between meningiomas and gliomas in the dataset, the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was also calculated. The trCNN showed an accuracy of 94% (MCC = 0.88) on post-contrast T1 images, 91% (MCC = 0.81) on pre-contrast T1-images and 90% (MCC = 0.8) on T2 images.ConclusionsThe developed trCNN could be a reliable tool in distinguishing between different meningiomas and gliomas from MR images.

[1]  Chris L. de Korte,et al.  Transcutaneous versus intraoperative quantitative ultrasound for staging bovine hepatic steatosis , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[2]  T. Banzato,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasonographic images and cytology in relation to histopathology of canine and feline liver: An ex-vivo study. , 2015, Research in veterinary science.

[3]  Curtis Wells Dewey,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone or in combination with surgery for treatment of canine intracranial meningiomas. , 2015, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[4]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Good Practice in Large-Scale Learning for Image Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  T. Banzato,et al.  Correlation of renal histopathology with renal echogenicity in dogs and cats: an ex-vivo quantitative study , 2015, BMC Veterinary Research.

[6]  R. T. Bentley,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of brain tumors in dogs. , 2015, Veterinary journal.

[7]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[10]  J. Amigo,et al.  Texture analysis of pulmonary parenchymateous changes related to pulmonary thromboembolism in dogs – a novel approach using quantitative methods , 2017, BMC Veterinary Research.

[11]  T. Banzato,et al.  Estimation of fetal lung development using quantitative analysis of ultrasonographic images in normal canine pregnancy. , 2017, Theriogenology.

[12]  Vishal Gupta,et al.  Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey , 2016, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[13]  Marco Bernardini,et al.  Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images to predict histologic grade of meningiomas in dogs. , 2017, American journal of veterinary research.

[14]  Luciano M Prevedello,et al.  Machine Learning in Radiology: Applications Beyond Image Interpretation. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[15]  T Banzato,et al.  Use of transfer learning to detect diffuse degenerative hepatic diseases from ultrasound images in dogs: A methodological study. , 2018, Veterinary journal.

[16]  Heung-Il Suk,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. , 2017, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  A. Petrie,et al.  Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. , 2010, Theriogenology.

[18]  C. Vite,et al.  Postmortem evaluation of 435 cases of intracranial neoplasia in dogs and relationship of neoplasm with breed, age, and body weight. , 2013, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[19]  Penousal Machado,et al.  Image descriptors in radiology images: a systematic review , 2017, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[20]  Haitham M. Al-Angari,et al.  Association of Diabetes Related Complications with Heart Rate Variability among a Diabetic Population in the UAE , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  K. Dreyer,et al.  When Machines Think: Radiology's Next Frontier. , 2017, Radiology.

[22]  N. Jeffery,et al.  Systematic Review of Brain Tumor Treatment in Dogs , 2015, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[23]  T. Banzato,et al.  Texture analysis of B-mode ultrasound images to stage hepatic lipidosis in the dairy cow: A methodological study. , 2016, Research in veterinary science.

[24]  T. Banzato,et al.  Relationship of diagnostic accuracy of renal cortical echogenicity with renal histopathology in dogs and cats, a quantitative study , 2016, BMC Veterinary Research.

[25]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  C. D. de Korte,et al.  Noninvasive detection of hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows with calibrated ultrasonographic image analysis. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.