Functional mapping of reaction norms to multiple environmental signals.

Whether there are different genes involved in response to different environmental signals and how these genes interact to determine the final expression of the trait are of fundamental importance in agricultural and biological research. We present a statistical framework for mapping environment-induced genes (or quantitative trait loci, QTLs) of major effects on the expression of a trait that respond to changing environments. This framework is constructed with a maximum-likelihood-based mixture model, in which the mean and covariance structure of environment-induced responses is modelled. The means for responses to continuous environmental states, referred to as reaction norms, are approximated for different QTL genotypes by mathematical equations that were derived from fundamental biological principles or based on statistical goodness-of-fit to observational data. The residual covariance between different environmental states was modelled by autoregressive processes. Such an approach to studying the genetic control of reaction norms can be expected to be advantageous over traditional mapping approaches in which no biological principles and statistical structures are considered. We demonstrate the analytical procedure and power of this approach by modelling the photosynthetic rate process as a function of temperature and light irradiance. Our approach allows for testing how a QTL affects the reaction norm of photosynthetic rate to a specific environment and whether there exist different QTLs to mediate photosynthetic responses to temperature and light irradiance, respectively.

[1]  J. Jensen,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied by use of reaction norms , 2000 .

[2]  J. Cheverud,et al.  A Mechanistic Model for Genetic Machinery of Ontogenetic Growth , 2004, Genetics.

[3]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Plant and Crop Modelling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology , 1990 .

[4]  Jennie Dusheck,et al.  Evolutionary developmental biology: It's the ecology, stupid! , 2002, Nature.

[5]  J. Ibrahim,et al.  A Flexible B‐Spline Model for Multiple Longitudinal Biomarkers and Survival , 2005, Biometrics.

[6]  Rongling Wu,et al.  THE DETECTION OF PLASTICITY GENES IN HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Jürgen Borlak Handbook of toxicogenomics : strategies and applications , 2005 .

[8]  S. Sultan Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[9]  S. Rice,et al.  A general population genetic theory for the evolution of developmental interactions , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size , 2004 .

[11]  S. Sultan,et al.  Promising directions in plant phenotypic plasticity , 2004 .

[12]  H. Nijhout,et al.  Critical weight in the development of insect body size , 2003, Evolution & development.

[13]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[14]  M. Pourahmadi Joint mean-covariance models with applications to longitudinal data: Unconstrained parameterisation , 1999 .

[15]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  G. Casella,et al.  A General Framework for Analyzing the Genetic Architecture of Developmental Characteristics , 2004, Genetics.

[17]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A joint model for nonparametric functional mapping of longitudinal trajectory and time-to-event , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  S. Scheiner Genetics and Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity , 1993 .

[19]  R. Nelsen An Introduction to Copulas , 1998 .

[20]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Structured Antedependence Models for Functional Mapping of Multiple Longitudinal Traits , 2005, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[22]  R Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Lund,et al.  Linkage analysis in longitudinal data using random regression. , 2002 .

[24]  Colin O. Wu,et al.  Nonparametric Mixed Effects Models for Unequally Sampled Noisy Curves , 2001, Biometrics.

[25]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. , 1995, Genetics.

[26]  Q. Cronk Plant eco-devo: the potential of poplar as a model organism. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[27]  Rongling Wu Simulated optimal structure of a photosynthetic system: implication for the breeding of forest crop ideotype , 1993 .

[28]  D. Roff Phenotypic Evolution — A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1999, Heredity.

[29]  S. Sultan The Promise of Ecological Developmental Biology , 2003 .

[30]  S. Sultan,et al.  An emerging focus on plant ecological development. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[31]  M. Kenward,et al.  Parametric modelling of growth curve data: An overview , 2001 .

[32]  The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity , 2008 .

[33]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[34]  Vicente Núñez-Antón,et al.  Longitudinal data with nonstationary errors: a nonparametric three-stage approach , 1999 .

[35]  K. Gabriel,et al.  Ante-dependence Analysis of an Ordered Set of Variables , 1962 .

[36]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A non-stationary model for functional mapping of complex traits , 2005, Bioinform..

[37]  G. Casella,et al.  Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. , 2002, Genetics.

[38]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[39]  J. Mateu,et al.  Nonseparable stationary anisotropic space–time covariance functions , 2006 .

[40]  G. Casella,et al.  Molecular Dissection of Allometry, Ontogeny, and Plasticity: A Genomic View of Developmental Biology , 2003 .

[41]  Wei Zhao,et al.  A Fast Algorithm for Functional Mapping of Complex Traits , 2004, Genetics.

[42]  L. R. Schaeffer,et al.  Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows , 1993 .

[43]  Gilbert MacKenzie,et al.  On modelling mean‐covariance structures in longitudinal studies , 2003 .

[44]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Functional mapping for quantitative trait loci governing growth rates: a parametric model. , 2003, Physiological genomics.

[45]  J. Wolf,et al.  The geometry of phenotypic evolution in developmental hyperspace , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Carl D. Schlichting,et al.  The Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1986 .

[47]  L. Bertalanffy Quantitative Laws in Metabolism and Growth , 1957 .

[48]  R. Wu,et al.  Functional mapping — how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  J. Jensen,et al.  Genotype by Environment Interaction in Nordic Dairy Cattle Studied Using Reaction Norms , 2002 .

[50]  S. Sultan,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in plants: a case study in ecological development , 2003, Evolution & development.

[51]  Rudolf A. Raff,et al.  Evo-devo: the evolution of a new discipline , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  S. Leal Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 2001 .

[53]  M. Pourahmadi,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of large covariance matrices of longitudinal data , 2003 .

[54]  W. Arthur,et al.  The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology , 2002, Nature.

[55]  H. Nijhout,et al.  The Physiological Basis of Reaction Norms: The Interaction Among Growth Rate, the Duration of Growth and Body Size1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.

[56]  Jorge Mateu,et al.  Modelling spatio-temporal data: A new variogram and covariance structure proposal , 2007 .

[57]  S. Stearns The Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic PlasticityPhenotypic sources of variation among organisms can be described by developmental switches and reaction norms , 1989 .

[58]  J. Kingsolver,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF CONTINUOUS REACTION NORMS: THERMAL SENSITIVITY OF CATERPILLAR GROWTH RATES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.