Minimizing the Human? Functional Reductions of Complexity in Social Robotics and Their Cybernetic Heritage

Recently designers at the Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratory (ATR, Kyoto) decided to shift their focus away from highly-lifelike androids to very minimalistic appearances like that of the Telenoid, Elfoid and Hugvie models. Instead of trying to simulate the appearance and behavior of actual human beings, the decision was to sidestep the Uncanny Valley problem by restricting the robots to a functional minimum in human likeness. This chapter investigates different approaches to complexity reduction in social robotics, among them experiments that compared human mime artists (theatrical robots) with actual robots in the interaction with autistic children and the implementation of cartoon techniques to model emotions in the generation of projected facial expressions. The notion of complexity reduction is discussed with respect to its merits (especially from a systems theoretical framework) and to its drawbacks. Beyond ethical considerations, the chapter argues that the research on social robotics is linked with the cybernetic hypothesis (as formulated by Tiqqun), a contemporary mode of governance and regulation that privileges certain kinds of subjectification via communication and discourages others.

[1]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[2]  Michel Foucault,et al.  Madness and Civilization , 1961 .

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design issues on interactive environments for children with autism , 2000 .

[4]  Luthffi Idzhar Ismail,et al.  Initial Response in HRI- a Case Study on Evaluation of Child with Autism Spectrum Disorders Interacting with a Humanoid Robot NAO , 2012 .

[5]  Julia Fink,et al.  Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction , 2012, ICSR.

[6]  B. Robins,et al.  Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot , 2006 .

[7]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Always-on/Always-on-you: The Thetered Self , 2008 .

[8]  Lauren M. Schmitt,et al.  The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review. , 2012, Research in autism spectrum disorders.

[9]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[10]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[11]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  In good company?: On the threshold of robotic Companions , 2010 .

[12]  Alan D. Schrift,et al.  Discipline and Punish , 2013 .

[13]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Living with Seal Robots in a Care House - Evaluations of Social and Physiological Influences , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Yoshio Iwai,et al.  Generation of Facial Expression Emphasized with Cartoon Techniques Using a Cellular-Phone-Type Teleoperated Robot with a Mobile Projector , 2013, HCI.

[15]  K. Deutsch The nerves of government : models of political communication and control , 1965 .

[16]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[17]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics. , 1948, Scientific American.

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy , 2003, Robotica.

[19]  Gregor Wolbring,et al.  Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[20]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[21]  Russell Blackford Robots and reality: a reply to Robert Sparrow , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[22]  M. Foucault,et al.  Madness and civilization : a history of insanity in the age of reason , 1966 .

[23]  F. M. Neves,et al.  O que há de complexo no mundo complexo? Niklas Luhmann e a Teoria dos Sistemas Sociais , 2006 .

[24]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[25]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[26]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement , 1978 .

[27]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[28]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2009 .

[29]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .

[30]  M. Paetau Niklas Luhmann and Cybernetics , 2014 .

[31]  M. Dorigo,et al.  Intelligent Robots and Autonomous Agents , 2002 .