Anxiety and the deployment of visual attention over time

Two studies investigated the effects of anxiety on the time course of attention to threatening material. A rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm required report of words belonging to a prespecified semantic category with a distractor placed at varying positions preceding the target. Where there was little resemblance in meaning between distractors and targets, threat distractors briefly captured the attention of high state anxious individuals but only after a delay. Where distractors resembled the meaning of the targets, attention was captured more immediately, but processing of threat-related material was concentrated at different points in time as a function of both the degree of semantic resemblance between distractors and target, and state anxiety. The extent to which distractors are salient to the experimental task influences attentional capture and the temporal course of processing. The methodological implications of these results are discussed together with a new hypothesis about the effects of state anxiety on attention.

[1]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[2]  J. Williams Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders , 1991 .

[3]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias in anxiety: A defective inhibition hypothesis , 1994 .

[4]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[5]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  P. Barnard,et al.  Paying Attention to Meaning , 2004, Psychological science.

[7]  Adrian Wells,et al.  The Cognitive Science of Attention and Emotion , 2005 .

[8]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Anxiety and Attentional Bias: State and Trait , 1988 .

[9]  K. Arnell,et al.  Dual-task attention deficits in dysphoric mood. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  I. Arend,et al.  Emotional stimuli reduce the attentional blink in sub-clinical anxious subjects , 2002 .

[11]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[12]  A. Mathews,et al.  Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. , 2000, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Howard Bowman,et al.  Rendering information processing models of cognition and affect compu- tationally explicit: distributed executive control and the deployment of attention , 2003 .

[14]  A. Anderson,et al.  Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-Modelling Depressive Thought , 1993 .

[16]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[18]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Karin Mogg,et al.  Selective Attention and Anxiety: A Cognitive–Motivational Perspective , 2005 .

[20]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[21]  E. Fulcher,et al.  Cognitive biases in anxiety and attention to threat , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[23]  Hillary C. M. Nelson The National Adult Reading Test , 1982 .

[24]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .