The Impact of the Oral Pro fi ciency Interview on One Foreign Language Teacher Education Program

The Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) has been increasingly used in academia. However, while multiple studies have documented the growth in OPI implementation across the United States and the proficiency rates of its completers, few have focused specifically on foreign language teacher candidates, and even fewer have investigated the impact that this proficiency assessment may have on language teacher training programs. To better understand the impact of the OPI on foreign language teacher education programs and help guide programmatic decision making, a case study was conducted of one such program that recently implemented the OPI as part of its licensure requirements. The results confirmed earlier research with respect to expected proficiency outcomes of foreign language teacher candidates. The results also suggested that the OPI requirement did not negatively affect program enrollment, nor did teacher trainees negatively perceive the OPI requirement. Finally, the study provided evidence of the positive impact the OPI may have on a foreign language teacher education program. Recommended practices for implementing the OPI in teacher training programs and ways to support foreign language teacher candidates who must complete the assessment are

[1]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[2]  Lyle F. Bachman.  语言测试要略 = Fundamental considerations in language testing , 1990 .

[3]  B. Glaser.  Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[4]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[5]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[6]  A Study of Interrater Reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview in Five European Languages: Data from ESL, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. , 1995 .

[7]  Glenn Fulcher,et al.  Invalidating Validity Claims for the ACTFL Oral Rating Scale. , 1996 .

[8]  Karina Vidal,et al.  Weighing the Ways of the Flow: Twentieth Century Language Instruction , 2001 .

[9]  Glenn Fulcher,et al.  The Oral Proficiency Interview: A Research Agenda. , 2003 .

[10]  Elvira Swender,et al.  Oral Proficiency Testing in the Real World: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions , 2003 .

[11]  Judith E. Liskin–Gasparro.  The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Oral Proficiency Interview: A Brief History and Analysis of Their Survival , 2003 .

[12]  Lynn Pearson,et al.  Advanced proficiency for foreign language teacher candidates:: What can we do to help them achieve this goal? , 2006 .

[13]  E. Surface,et al.  What Proficiency Testing is Telling Us About Teacher Certification Candidates , 2007 .

[14]  Margaret E. Malone,et al.  Oral Proficiency Assessment: Current Approaches and Applications for Post-Secondary Foreign Language Programs , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[15]  Mary Ball.  Levels of the Oral Proficiency Skills of Foreign Language Teacher Candidates as Rated by Teacher Educators: A Descriptive Study , 2010 .

[16]  Joanna Sullivan,et al.  Taking Charge: Teacher Candidates' Preparation for the Oral Proficiency Interview , 2011 .

[17]  Krista S. Chambless.  Teachers' oral proficiency in the target language: research on its role in language teaching and learning , 2012 .

[18]  Eric A. Surface,et al.  Oral proficiency standards and foreign language teacher candidates: current findings and future research directions , 2013 .