Inadequate and infrequent are not alike: ERPs to deviant prosodic patterns in spoken sentence comprehension

The current study on German investigates Event-Related brain Potentials (ERPs) for the perception of sentences with intonations which are infrequent (i.e. vocatives) or inadequate in daily conversation. These ERPs are compared to the processing correlates for sentences in which the syntax-to-prosody relations are congruent and used frequently during communication. Results show that perceiving an adequate but infrequent prosodic structure does not result in the same brain responses as encountering an inadequate prosodic pattern. While an early negative-going ERP followed by an N400 were observed for both the infrequent and the inadequate syntax-to-prosody association, only the inadequate intonation also elicits a P600.

[1]  A Schepman,et al.  Prosody and Parsing in Coordination Structures , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences , 1990, Brain and Language.

[3]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  It's Early: Event-related Potential Evidence for Initial Interaction of Syntax and Prosody in Speech Comprehension , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  The Dutch foot and the chanted call , 1993, Journal of Linguistics.

[5]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  F Ferreira,et al.  Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  D. Schön,et al.  Musician Children Detect Pitch Violations in Both Music and Language Better than Nonmusician Children: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Approaches , 2006 .

[9]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  E. Grabe,et al.  Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities , 1995 .

[12]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[13]  K. Pike,et al.  The intonation of American English , 1946 .

[14]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[15]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Anne Lacheret,et al.  On-line Processing of Pop-Out Words in Spoken French Dialogues , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[19]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[20]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[21]  D. Schön,et al.  The music of speech: music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[22]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-driven Sentence Processing: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  William R. Leben,et al.  The Tones in English Intonation , 1976 .

[24]  I. Lehiste.  The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .

[25]  H. Jasper.  Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[26]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Prosodic Breaks and Attachment Decisions in Sentence Parsing. , 1996 .

[27]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[28]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[29]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Exploring the architecture of the language-processing system , 1991 .

[30]  A. Friederici.  Event-related brain potential studies in language , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[31]  Stefan Heim,et al.  Prosodic pitch accents in language comprehension and production: ERP data and acoustic analyses. , 2006, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[32]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[33]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[34]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences , 1992, Brain and Language.

[35]  John F Connolly,et al.  Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: A high‐resolution event‐related brain potential study , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[37]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[38]  Johanneke Caspers,et al.  Experiments on the Meaning of Four Types of Single-Accent Intonation Patterns in Dutch , 2000, Language and speech.

[39]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[41]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[43]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts , 2007, Brain Research.

[45]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[46]  S R Speer,et al.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.