Tell Me Something I Don’t Already Know: Informedness and the Impact of Information Programs

Abstract We document how imperfect information generates heterogeneous effects in information treatments with personalized high-frequency feedback and peer comparisons. In our field experiment in retail electricity, we find that high- and low-energy users symmetrically underestimate and overestimate their relative energy use pretreatment. Responses to personalized feedback, however, are asymmetric. Households that overestimate their relative use and low users both respond by consuming more. These boomerang effects provide evidence that peer-comparison information programs, even those coupled with normative comparisons, are not guaranteed to lead to increases in prosocial behavior.

[1]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[2]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment , 2013 .

[3]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Sergio Firpo Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects , 2004 .

[5]  I. Ayres,et al.  Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage , 2009 .

[6]  Erich Muehlegger,et al.  Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing , 2009 .

[7]  Michael K. Price,et al.  Using Nonpecuniary Strategies to Influence Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2011, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Heterogeneous Impacts in PROGRESA , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Rupert Sausgruber,et al.  TESTING ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE FIELD: THREAT, MORAL APPEAL AND SOCIAL INFORMATION , 2013 .

[10]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[11]  James E. West,et al.  From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? the Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation * 1 Data 1.1 the Dataset 2 Experimental Design and Sorting Methodology , 2022 .

[12]  What Mean Impacts Miss , 2004 .

[13]  Edward Miguel,et al.  Spring cleaning: rural water impacts, valuation, and property rights institutions. , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[14]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Voting and so Should You , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  B. Frey,et al.  Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment , 2004 .

[16]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[17]  O. Svenson ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[18]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Energy Conservation "Nudges" and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment , 2010 .

[19]  Alan T. Sorensen,et al.  Calorie Posting in Chain Restaurants , 2010 .

[20]  Miriam Fischlein,et al.  Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975 to 2012 , 2013 .

[21]  P. Chiappori,et al.  A Theory of the Allocation of Time " , 2014 .

[22]  Michael K. Price,et al.  The Persistent Impacts of Norm-Based Messaging and Their Implications for Water Conservation , 2014 .

[23]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[24]  E. Somanathan,et al.  The importance of being informed: Experimental evidence on demand for environmental quality , 2008 .

[25]  H. Allcott,et al.  The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation , 2012 .

[26]  J. Suls,et al.  Flawed Self-Assessment , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[27]  Jonathan Zinman,et al.  Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Robert T. Jensen,et al.  The (Perceived) Returns to Education and the Demand for Schooling , 2010 .

[29]  Joseph Cook,et al.  Social Comparisons, Household Water Use, and Participation in Utility Conservation Programs: Evidence from Three Randomized Trials , 2015, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[30]  O. Bandiera,et al.  Awards Unbundled: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment , 2014 .

[31]  Matthew Osborne,et al.  Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination , 2007 .

[32]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Overconfidence and Social Signalling , 2013 .

[33]  Casey J. Wichman Information Provision and Consumer Behavior: A Natural Experiment in Billing Frequency , 2016 .

[34]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Do people really believe they are above average , 2008 .

[35]  Christopher R. Taber,et al.  Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of the Allocation of Time , 1965 .

[37]  J. Kruger Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  E. Duflo,et al.  The Role of Information and Social Interactions in Retirement Plan Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment , 2002 .

[39]  Jonah B. Gelbach,et al.  Distributional Impacts of the Self-Sufficiency Project , 2005 .

[40]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  J. Angrist Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2008 .

[42]  John Painter,et al.  Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[43]  Judd B. Kessler,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Nudges: A Case Study of Energy Use Social Comparisons , 2019, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

[44]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies , 1999 .

[45]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence , 2009 .

[46]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Comparison Friction: Experimental Evidence from Medicare Drug Plans , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[47]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions , 2008 .

[48]  T. Gilovich,et al.  How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life , 1991 .

[49]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  Paying Not to Go to the Gym , 2006 .

[50]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation , 2012 .