A Comparative Testing Study of Commercial 18650-Format Lithium-Ion Battery Cells

Demand for portable electronic and electrical devices has led to considerable growth in production of lithium-ion battery cells and the number of manufacturers thereof. However, due to lack of supplied information or independent verification, it is frequently difficult to compare cells based on available data. In this study, we conduct a comparative testing study on five types of 18650-format lithium-ion cells from three different commercial manufacturers, ranging from budget to high-performance cells. Key insights gathered in the comparison were that the tested budget cells frequently offer less than 20% of their rated capacity, that the budget cells degrade at a significantly higher proportional rate than other cells, and that certain high-performance cells exceed the size dimensions of the 18650-format by over 3%. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy testing showed the budget cells to have internal impedances several times higher than other cells, leading to notably increased heat generation and a significantly reduced cell efficiency. Differential capacity analysis found this high internal resistance to notably impede lithium intercalation processes. The presented methodology is intended as a base framework for conducting subsequent comparative testing studies for Li-ion cells. © The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. [DOI: 10.1149/2.0721508jes] All rights reserved.

[1]  N. Omar,et al.  Comparison of commercial battery cells in relation to material properties , 2013 .

[2]  Ellen Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  Electrochemical characterization and post-mortem analysis of aged LiMn2O4–Li(Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2)O2/graphite lithium ion batteries. Part I: Cycle aging , 2014 .

[3]  Elena M. Krieger,et al.  A comparison of lead-acid and lithium-based battery behavior and capacity fade in off-grid renewable charging applications , 2013 .

[4]  Matthieu Dubarry,et al.  Evaluation of commercial lithium-ion cells based on composite positive electrode for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle applications. Part II. Degradation mechanism under 2 C cycle aging , 2011 .

[5]  J. Barker,et al.  An electrochemical investigation into the lithium insertion properties of LixCoO2 , 1996 .

[6]  Matthieu Dubarry,et al.  Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model , 2012 .

[7]  D. Sauer,et al.  Characterization of high-power lithium-ion batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. II: Modelling , 2011 .

[8]  Matthieu Dubarry,et al.  Evaluation of commercial lithium-ion cells based on composite positive electrode for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle applications. Part I: Initial characterizations , 2011 .

[9]  D. Sauer,et al.  Influence of relaxation time on the lifetime of commercial lithium-ion cells , 2012 .

[10]  J. Dahn,et al.  Electrochemical and In Situ X‐Ray Diffraction Studies of Lithium Intercalation in Li x CoO2 , 1992 .

[11]  Gan Ning,et al.  Capacity fade study of lithium-ion batteries cycled at high discharge rates , 2003 .

[12]  D. Sauer,et al.  Calendar and cycle life study of Li(NiMnCo)O2-based 18650 lithium-ion batteries , 2014 .

[13]  D. Sauer,et al.  Characterization of high-power lithium-ion batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. I. Experimental investigation , 2011 .