Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers

The use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for photogrammetric surveying has recently gained enormous popularity. Images taken from UAVs are used for generating Digital Surface Models (DSMs) and orthorectified images. In the glaciological context, these can serve for quantifying ice volume change or glacier motion. This study focuses on the accuracy of UAV-derived DSMs. In particular, we analyze the influence of the number and disposition of Ground Control Points (GCPs) needed for georeferencing the derived products. A total of 1321 different DSMs were generated from eight surveys distributed on three glaciers in the Swiss Alps during winter, summer and autumn. The vertical and horizontal accuracy was assessed by cross-validation with thousands of validation points measured with a Global Positioning System. Our results show that the accuracy increases asymptotically with increasing number of GCPs until a certain density of GCPs is reached. We call this the optimal GCP density. The results indicate that DSMs built with this optimal GCP density have a vertical (horizontal) accuracy ranging between 0.10 and 0.25 m (0.03 and 0.09 m) across all datasets. In addition, the impact of the GCP distribution on the DSM accuracy was investigated. The local accuracy of a DSM decreases when increasing the distance to the closest GCP, typically at a rate of 0.09 m per 100-m distance. The impact of the glacier’s surface texture (ice or snow) was also addressed. The results show that besides cases with a surface covered by fresh snow, the surface texture does not significantly influence the DSM accuracy.

[1]  C. Ginzler,et al.  Monitoring of high alpine mass movements combining laser scanning with digital airborne photogrammetry , 2014 .

[2]  K. McGwire,et al.  Assessing the performance of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots , 2016 .

[3]  Andreas Stoffel,et al.  Mapping snow depth in alpine terrain with unmanned aerial systems (UASs): potential and limitations , 2016 .

[4]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[5]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[6]  Mark A. Weltz,et al.  Evaluation of structure from motion for soil microtopography measurement , 2014 .

[7]  Henri Eisenbeiss,et al.  UAVS FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS , 2010 .

[8]  Andreas Kääb,et al.  Surface kinematics of periglacial sorted circles using structure-from-motion technology , 2013 .

[9]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Suitability of ground-based SfM–MVS for monitoring glacial and periglacial processes , 2016 .

[10]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a UAV-Photogrammetry System for Precise 3D Environmental Modeling , 2015, Sensors.

[11]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[12]  M. Hoelzle,et al.  Use of an ultra-long-range terrestrial laser scanner to monitor the mass balance of very small glaciers in the Swiss Alps , 2016 .

[13]  E. Baltsavias,et al.  Digital Surface Modelling by Airborne Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetry for Glacier Monitoring , 2001 .

[14]  Andreas Scheidegger,et al.  Assessing the quality of digital elevation models obtained from mini unmanned aerial vehicles for overland flow modelling in urban areas , 2015 .

[15]  Matthias Huss,et al.  Application and validation of long-range terrestrial laser scanning to monitor the mass balance of very small glaciers in the Swiss Alps , 2016 .

[16]  J. Pomeroy,et al.  Accuracy of snow depth estimation in mountain and prairie environments by an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2016 .

[17]  F. Nex,et al.  UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review , 2014 .

[18]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Brief Communication: Low-cost, on-demand aerial photogrammetry for glaciological measurement , 2013 .

[19]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[20]  K. N. Tahar.  AN EVALUATION ON DIFFERENT NUMBER OF GROUND CONTROL POINTS IN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BLOCK , 2013 .

[21]  A. Lucieer,et al.  Using a micro-UAV for ultra-high resolution multi-sensor observations of Antarctic moss beds , 2012 .

[22]  K. Oost,et al.  Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms , 2016 .

[23]  A. Dégre,et al.  The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds , 2014 .

[24]  C. Strecha,et al.  PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PERFORMANCE OF AN ULTRA LIGHT WEIGHT SWINGLET UAV , 2012 .

[25]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Estimating evaporation with thermal UAV data and two-source energy balance models , 2016 .

[26]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[27]  Jan Boehm,et al.  Close-Range Photogrammetry and 3D Imaging , 2013 .

[28]  Irene Marzolff,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[29]  J. Ryan,et al.  UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet , 2015 .

[30]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle imagery to map and characterise surface features on a debris-covered glacier , 2016 .

[31]  L. Wallace,et al.  Snow Depth Retrieval with UAS Using Photogrammetric Techniques , 2015 .

[32]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[34]  N. Barrand,et al.  Optimizing photogrammetric DEMs for glacier volume change assessment using laser-scanning derived ground-control points , 2009, Journal of Glaciology.

[35]  Khairul Nizam Tahar,et al.  Assessment on Ground Control Points in Unmanned Aerial System Image Processing for Slope Mapping Studies , 2012 .

[36]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[37]  M. Nolan,et al.  Mapping snow depth from manned aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[38]  T. Udelhoven,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF UAV-PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR CREATING DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS (DEM) , 2012 .

[39]  Richard E. Brazier,et al.  Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: current capabilities and future perspectives , 2016 .

[40]  WhiteheadKen,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems (UASs), part 1: a review of progress and challenges1 , 2014 .

[41]  S. M. Jong,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[42]  Fernando Santos Osório,et al.  The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor network in agricultural applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[43]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[44]  Claudio Smiraglia,et al.  High-resolution mapping of glacier surface features. The UAV survey of the Forni Glacier (Stelvio National Park, Italy) , 2015 .

[45]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[46]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[47]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan® and MicMac® in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[48]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaelogical areas : two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy) , 2011 .

[49]  Görres Grenzdörffer,et al.  THE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC POTENTIAL OF LOW-COST UAVs IN FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURE , 2008 .

[50]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment with small unmanned aircraft systems ( UASs ) , part 1 : a review of progress and challenges 1 , 2014 .