REPDOSE: A database on repeated dose toxicity studies of commercial chemicals--A multifunctional tool.

A database for repeated dose toxicity data has been developed. Studies were selected by data quality. Review documents or risk assessments were used to get a pre-screened selection of available valid data. The structure of the chemicals should be rather simple for well defined chemical categories. The database consists of three core data sets for each chemical: (1) structural features and physico-chemical data, (2) data on study design, (3) study results. To allow consistent queries, a high degree of standardization categories and glossaries were developed for relevant parameters. At present, the database consists of 364 chemicals investigated in 1018 studies which resulted in a total of 6002 specific effects. Standard queries have been developed, which allow analyzing the influence of structural features or PC data on LOELs, target organs and effects. Furthermore, it can be used as an expert system. First queries have shown that the database is a very valuable tool.

[1]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Introduction General Considerations , 2022 .

[2]  D. Bristol,et al.  The NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Project. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  J. Ahlers,et al.  Toxicity and ecotoxicity of sulfonic acids: Structure-activity relationship , 1994 .

[4]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  M. Cronin,et al.  Pitfalls in QSAR , 2003 .

[6]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  A G Renwick,et al.  Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern--guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[8]  I Mangelsdorf,et al.  Commentary on the application of (Q)SAR to the toxicological evaluation of existing chemicals. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[9]  C. Ioannides,et al.  COMPACT and molecular structure in toxicity assessment: a prospective evaluation of 30 chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Helmut Greim,et al.  Occupational Toxicants: Critical Data Evaluation for MAK Values and Classification of Carcinogens , 1998 .

[11]  I C Munro,et al.  Thresholds of toxicological concern based on structure-activity relationships. , 1996, Drug metabolism reviews.

[12]  Inge Mangelsdorf,et al.  Some aspects relating to the evaluation of the effects of chemicals on male fertility. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  N. Nikolova,et al.  International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, LUMO energy ± The Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) , 2022 .

[14]  M. C. Newman,et al.  The practice of structure activity relationships (SAR) in toxicology. , 2000, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  L A Knauf,et al.  Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL). , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[16]  K. Verschueren Handbook of environmental data on organic chemicals , 1977 .

[17]  Susan Budavari,et al.  The Merck index : an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals , 1983 .

[18]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Use of Quantitative Structrure-Activity Relationships in International Decision-Making Frameworks to Predict Ecologic Effects and Environmental Fate of Chemical Substances. , 2003 .

[19]  H Greim,et al.  Assessment of structurally related chemicals: toxicity and ecotoxicity of acrylic acid and acrylic acid alkyl esters (acrylates), methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid alkyl esters (methacrylates). , 1995, Chemosphere.

[20]  E Hulzebos,et al.  (Q)SARs for human toxicological endpoints: a literaturesearch , 1999 .

[21]  A M Richard Commercial toxicology prediction systems: a regulatory perspective. , 1998, Toxicology letters.