Exposing Digital Forgeries in Interlaced and Deinterlaced Video

With the advent of high-quality digital video cameras and sophisticated video editing software, it is becoming increasingly easier to tamper with digital video. A growing number of video surveillance cameras are also giving rise to an enormous amount of video data. The ability to ensure the integrity and authenticity of these data poses considerable challenges. We describe two techniques for detecting traces of tampering in deinterlaced and interlaced video. For deinterlaced video, we quantify the correlations introduced by the camera or software deinterlacing algorithms and show how tampering can disturb these correlations. For interlaced video, we show that the motion between fields of a single frame and across fields of neighboring frames should be equal. We propose an efficient way to measure these motions and show how tampering can disturb this relationship.

[1]  Ming Gu,et al.  Advanced Motion Search and Adaptation Techniques for Deinterlacing , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[2]  Weihong Wang,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries in video by detecting double MPEG compression , 2006, MM&Sec '06.

[3]  Y. J. Tejwani,et al.  Robot vision , 1989, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems,.

[4]  Jed Deame Motion Compensated De-Interlacing: The Key to the Digital Video Transition , 1999 .

[5]  Hany Farid,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling , 2005 .

[6]  Jessica Fridrich,et al.  Detection of Copy-Move Forgery in Digital Images , 2004 .

[7]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Performance of optical flow techniques , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Jan Lukás,et al.  Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Kenji Sugiyama,et al.  A method of de-interlacing with motion compensated interpolation , 1999, 1999 Digest of Technical Papers. International Conference on Consumer Electronics (Cat. No.99CH36277).

[10]  Hany Farid,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries by detecting inconsistencies in lighting , 2005, MM&Sec '05.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Differentiation of Discrete Multi-Dimensional Signals , 2004 .

[12]  Roberto Castagno,et al.  A method for motion adaptive frame rate up-conversion , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[13]  Erwin B. Bellers,et al.  Deinterlacing-an overview , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Differentiation of discrete multidimensional signals , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Hany Farid,et al.  Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics , 2004, Information Hiding.

[16]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  A model for image splicing , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[17]  Alin C. Popescu,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  Motion compensated frame rate conversion of motion pictures , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[19]  Eero P. Simoncelli Bayesian multi-scale differential optical flow , 1999 .

[20]  Erwin B. Bellers,et al.  De-Interlacing: A Key Technology for Scan Rate Conversion , 2000 .