Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of skin cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes: a UK population-based cohort study

Introduction The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme significantly influences carcinogenic pathways in the skin. The objective of this study was to determine whether DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with the incidence of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer, compared with sulfonylureas. Research design and methods Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we assembled two new-user active comparator cohorts for each skin cancer outcome from 2007 to 2019. For melanoma, the cohort included 96 739 DPP-4 inhibitor users and 209 341 sulfonylurea users, and 96 411 DPP-4 inhibitor users and 208 626 sulfonylurea users for non-melanoma skin cancer. Propensity score fine stratification weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, separately. Results Overall, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a 23% decreased risk of melanoma compared with sulfonylureas (49.7 vs 65.3 per 100 000 person-years, respectively; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.96). The HR progressively reduced with increasing cumulative duration of use (0–2 years HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.54; 2.1–5 years HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.66; >5 years HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.74). In contrast, these drugs were not associated with the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with sulfonylureas (448.1 vs 426.1 per 100 000 person-years, respectively; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.15). Conclusions In this large, population-based cohort study, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of melanoma but not non-melanoma skin cancer, compared with sulfonylureas.

[1]  L. Ji,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase 4-inhibitor treatment was associated with a reduced incidence of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of 115 randomized controlled trials with 121961 participants , 2022, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[2]  P. Busek,et al.  Does DPP-IV Inhibition Offer New Avenues for Therapeutic Intervention in Malignant Disease? , 2022, Cancers.

[3]  V. Sondak,et al.  The State of Melanoma: Emergent Challenges and Opportunities , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Jeong Hyun Park,et al.  Pleiotropic Benefits of DPP-4 Inhibitors Beyond Glycemic Control , 2021, Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes.

[5]  W. Dempsey,et al.  Reflecting on “A Statistician in Medicine” in 2020 , 2020, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  V. A. Jones,et al.  The role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase‐4 in cutaneous disease , 2020, Experimental dermatology.

[7]  Xuefeng Yu,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and their potential immune modulatory functions , 2020, Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

[8]  M. Monami,et al.  Risk of cancer in patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: an extensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2020, Acta Diabetologica.

[9]  Jessica M Franklin,et al.  Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners , 2019, BMJ.

[10]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  Sulfonylurea derivatives and cancer, friend or foe? , 2019, European journal of pharmacology.

[11]  S. Mattarollo,et al.  The Role of CXCR3 and Its Chemokine Ligands in Skin Disease and Cancer , 2018, Front. Med..

[12]  B. Shields,et al.  Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of drugs for diabetes in England from 1998 to 2017 , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[13]  Lisa J. McQuay,et al.  Validation of Cancer Cases Using Primary Care, Cancer Registry, and Hospitalization Data in the United Kingdom , 2017, Epidemiology.

[14]  Y. Xi,et al.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  J. Gelfand,et al.  Validity of diagnostic codes for identifying cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in The Health Improvement Network , 2017, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  L. Ferris,et al.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer and risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality: a systematic review , 2017, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[17]  F. Camacho-Martínez,et al.  Three Cases of Bullous Pemphigoid Associated with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors - One due to Linagliptin , 2016, Dermatology.

[18]  I. Petersen,et al.  Trends in incidence, prevalence and prescribing in type 2 diabetes mellitus between 2000 and 2013 in primary care: a retrospective cohort study , 2016, BMJ Open.

[19]  Matthew L Albert,et al.  Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 inhibition enhances lymphocyte trafficking, improving both naturally occurring tumor immunity and immunotherapy , 2015, Nature Immunology.

[20]  K. Bhaskaran,et al.  Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries , 2013, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[22]  A. Joshua,et al.  Melanoma prevention: are we doing enough? A Canadian perspective. , 2012, Current oncology.

[23]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study. , 2012, Cancer epidemiology.

[24]  M. Pittman,et al.  CXCR3 enhances a T-cell-dependent epidermal proliferative response and promotes skin tumorigenesis. , 2011, Cancer research.

[25]  P. Home,et al.  Experience of malignancies with oral glucose-lowering drugs in the randomised controlled ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) and RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes) clinical trials , 2010, Diabetologia.

[26]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review , 2010, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[27]  P. Austin Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  D. Drucker,et al.  Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2009, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[29]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  T. Bieber,et al.  Enhanced type I interferon signaling and recruitment of chemokine receptor CXCR3‐expressing lymphocytes into the skin following treatment with the TLR7‐agonist imiquimod , 2005, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[31]  W. Ray,et al.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  Corri Black,et al.  Validity of the General Practice Research Database , 2003, Pharmacotherapy.

[33]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[34]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[35]  R. Lawrenson,et al.  Clinical information for research; the use of general practice databases. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[36]  G. Rassner,et al.  Aminopeptidase M and dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity in epithelial skin tumors: a histochemical study , 1995, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[37]  H Jick,et al.  Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. , 1991, BMJ.

[38]  S. Suissa,et al.  Number needed to treat is incorrect without proper time-related considerations. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[39]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Validation of THIN data for non-melanoma skin cancer. , 2008, Quality in primary care.

[40]  C. Abbott,et al.  DPIV/CD26 and FAP in cancer: a tale of contradictions. , 2006, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.