Retrieval of abstract semantics

Behavioural and neuropsychological evidence suggests that abstract and concrete concepts might be represented, retrieved and processed differently in the human brain. Using fMRI, we demonstrate that retrieval of abstract relative to sensory-based semantics during synonym judgements increased activation in a left frontotemporal system that has been associated with semantic processing particularly at the sentence level. Since activation increases were observed irrespective of the degree of difficulty, we suggest that these differential activations might reflect a particular retrieval mechanism or strategy for abstract concepts. In contrast to sensory-based semantics, the meaning of abstract concepts is largely specified by their usage in language rather than by their relations to the physical world. Subjects might therefore generate an appropriate semantic sentential context to fully explore and specify the meaning of abstract concepts. Our results also explain why abstract semantics is vulnerable to left frontotemporal lesions.

[1]  N. Martin,et al.  A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study , 1992, Brain and Language.

[2]  R. W. Stowe,et al.  Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words , 1988 .

[3]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  G Hickok,et al.  Role of anterior temporal cortex in auditory sentence comprehension: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Robert Turner,et al.  Trajectory measurement and generalised reconstruction in rectilinear EPI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  R. Turner,et al.  Assessing Study-Specific Regional Variations in fMRI Signal , 2000, NeuroImage.

[10]  K. Willmes,et al.  On the Functional Neuroanatomy of Intrinsic and Phasic Alertness , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  M Poncet,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  U. Noppeney.  Functional imaging of the semantic system. , 2004 .

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[14]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[15]  Shula Chiat,et al.  Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon. Part 2—verbs , 1996, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[16]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Semantic Influences on Thematic Role Assignment: Evidence from Normals and Aphasics , 1998, Brain and Language.

[17]  D. Caplan,et al.  Processing of Visually Presented Sentences in Mandarin and English Studied with fMRI , 1999, Neuron.

[18]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.

[19]  E. Warrington,et al.  Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report , 1995, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[20]  R. Dolan,et al.  The Neural Correlates of the Noradrenergic Modulation of Human Attention, Arousal and Learning , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Response of Left Temporal Cortex to Sentences , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[23]  R. Turner,et al.  Sentence Reading: A Functional MRI Study at 4 Tesla , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Jane Marshall,et al.  Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon. Part 1—nouns , 1996, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[25]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[26]  G Mulder,et al.  Sentence comprehension and word repetition: a positron emission tomography investigation. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[29]  E. Warrington.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[30]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder , 1990, Brain and Language.

[31]  Murray Grossman,et al.  The Neural Basis for Category-Specific Knowledge: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  C. T. James.  The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[33]  S. Scott,et al.  Noun imageability and the temporal lobes , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Farah,et al.  A functional MRI study of mental image generation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .

[36]  H. Coslett,et al.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[37]  A. Sirigu,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[39]  Richard J. Epstein,et al.  Current perspectives in dysphasia , 1985 .

[40]  D. Bub,et al.  The Neural Substrate for Concrete, Abstract, and Emotional Word Lexica A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Time-Related Changes in Neural Systems Underlying Attention and Arousal During the Performance of an Auditory Vigilance Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. , 1986 .