Selection on silent sites in the rodent H3 histone gene family.

Selection promoting differential use of synonymous codons has been shown for several unicellular organisms and for Drosophila, but not for mammals. Selection coefficients operating on synonymous codons are likely to be extremely small, so that a very large effective population size is required for selection to overcome the effects of drift. In mammals, codon-usage bias is believed to be determined exclusively by mutation pressure, with differences between genes due to large-scale variation in base composition around the genome. The replication-dependent histone genes are expressed at extremely high levels during periods of DNA synthesis, and thus are among the most likely mammalian genes to be affected by selection on synonymous codon usage. We suggest that the extremely biased pattern of codon usage in the H3 genes is determined in part by selection. Silent site G + C content is much higher than expected based on flanking sequence G + C content, compared to other rodent genes with similar silent site base composition but lower levels of expression. Dinucleotide-mediated mutation bias does affect codon usage, but the affect is limited to the choice between G and C in some fourfold degenerate codons. Gene conversion between the two clusters of histone genes has not been an important force in the evolution of the H3 genes, but gene conversion appears to have had some effect within the cluster on chromosome 13.

[1]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[2]  Amy S. Lee,et al.  Cell-cycle regulatory sequences in a hamster histone promoter and their interactions with cellular factors , 1987, Nature.

[3]  D C Shields,et al.  "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Histone genes are clustered but not tandemly repeated in the chicken genome. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Hurt,et al.  The mouse histone H2a.2 gene from chromosome 3. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  J. Filipski,et al.  Correlation between molecular clock ticking, codon usage, fidelity of DNA repair, chromosome banding and chromatin compactness in germline cells , 1987, FEBS letters.

[7]  W. Marzluff,et al.  Mouse histone H2A and H2B genes: four functional genes and a pseudogene undergoing gene conversion with a closely linked functional gene. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  N. Heintz,et al.  Xenopus laevis histone genes: Variant H1 genes are present in different clusters , 1980, Cell.

[9]  D. Schümperli,et al.  Structure of a mouse histone-encoding gene cluster. , 1990, Gene.

[10]  M. Nei,et al.  Extent of protein polymosphism and the neutral mutation theory , 1984 .

[11]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[12]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  R A Graves,et al.  Structure of a cluster of mouse histone genes. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. , 1976, Science.

[15]  M. Bulmer,et al.  A statistical analysis of nucleotide sequences of introns and exons in human genes. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  D. Hillis,et al.  Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  Paul M. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes , 1986, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Coevolution of codon usage and transfer RNA abundance , 1987, Nature.

[19]  M. Birnstiel,et al.  The organization and expression of histone gene families , 1981, Cell.

[20]  R. Graves,et al.  Differential expression of two clusters of mouse histone genes. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  J. Hey,et al.  Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  L. Hood,et al.  The organization, expression, and evolution of antibody genes and other multigene families. , 1975, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  J. Felsenstein.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  A. Letsou,et al.  Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. , 1987, Genetics.

[25]  L. Kedes,et al.  Distinct organizations and patterns of expression of early and late histone gene sets in the sea urchin , 1983, Nature.

[26]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome , 1989, Nature.

[27]  P. Sharp,et al.  Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for 'rare' codons. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  S. Aota,et al.  Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  M. Birnstiel,et al.  Structure and expression in L-cells of a cloned H4 histone gene of the mouse. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  E. L. Smith,et al.  Calf and pea histone IV. 3. Complete amino acid sequence of pea seedling histone IV; comparison with the homologous calf thymus histone. , 1969, The Journal of biological chemistry.