Mapping the Dutch SNOMED CT subset to Omaha System, NANDA International and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

BACKGROUND Nurses register data in electronic health records, which can use various terminology and coding systems. The net result is that information cannot be exchanged and reused properly, for example when a patient is transferred from one care setting to another. A nursing subset of patient problems was therefore developed in the Netherlands, based on comparable and exchangeable terms that are used throughout the healthcare sector and elsewhere (semantic interoperability). The purpose of the current research is to develop a mapping between the subset of patient problems and three classifications in order to improve the exchangeability of data. Those classifications are the Omaha System, NANDA International, and ICF (the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health). METHOD Descriptive research using a unidirectional mapping strategy. RESULTS Some 30%-39% of the 119 SNOMED CT patient problems can be mapped one-to-one from the subset onto each separate classification. Between 6% and 8% have been mapped partially to a related term. This is considered to be a one-to-one mapping, although the meanings do not correspond fully. Additionally, 23%-51% of the patient problems could be mapped n-to-one, i.e. more specifically than the classification. Some loss of information will always occur in such exchanges. Between 1% and 4% of the patient problems from the subset are defined less specifically than the problems within the individual classifications. Finally, it turns out that 9%-32% of the terms from the subset of patient problems could not be mapped onto a classification, either because they did not occur in the classification or because they could not be mapped at a higher level. CONCLUSION To promote the exchange of data, the subset of patient problems has been mapped onto three classifications. Loss of information occurs in most cases when the patient problems are transformed from the subset into a classification. This arises because the classifications are different in structure and in the degree of detail. Structural cooperation between suppliers, healthcare organisations and the experts involved is required in order to determine how the mapping should be used within the electronic health records, and whether it is usable in day-to-day practice.

[1]  K. Crawford,et al.  Communication between residential aged care facilities and the emergency department: a review of the literature. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[2]  Nicholas R. Hardiker,et al.  Case Report: Translation and Integration of CCC Nursing Diagnoses into ICNP , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  S. Hyun,et al.  Cross-mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha System and NIC for unified nursing language system development. International Classification for Nursing Practice. International Council of Nurses. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Home Health Care Classification. Nursing Interventions Clas , 2002, International nursing review.

[4]  Nicholas R. Hardiker,et al.  Semantic mappings and locality of nursing diagnostic concepts in UMLS , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  P. Wieteck Furthering the development of standardized nursing terminology through an ENP-ICNP cross-mapping. , 2008, International nursing review.

[6]  T. Herdman,et al.  Nanda international nursing diagnoses : definitions and classifications , 2009 .

[7]  C. Holly,et al.  A systematic review on the transfer of information during nurse transitions in care. , 2014, Journal of clinical nursing.

[8]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Model Formulation: Integrating Nursing Diagnostic Concepts into the Medical Entities Dictionary Using the ISO Reference Terminology Model for Nursing Diagnosis , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  An Evaluation of the Utility of the CEN Categorial Structure for Nursing Diagnoses as a Terminology Model for Integrating Nursing Diagnosis Concepts into SNOMED , 2001, Medinfo.

[10]  Karen S. Martin,et al.  The Omaha system : a key to practice, documentation, and information management , 2005 .

[11]  Shortfalls in residents' transfer documentation: challenges for emergency department staff. , 2014, Australasian emergency nursing journal : AENJ.

[12]  Nicholas R. Hardiker,et al.  Inter-terminology mapping of nursing problems , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  An evaluation of the usefulness of two terminology models for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED Clinical Terms® , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Maribel Gonzalez Samartino,et al.  Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy. , 2012 .

[15]  William Goossen,et al.  Cross-mapping between three terminologies with the international standard nursing reference terminology model. , 2006, International journal of nursing terminologies and classifications : the official journal of NANDA International.

[16]  Bonnie L Westra,et al.  Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. , 2008, Nursing outlook.

[17]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  Erratum to "Cross-terminology mapping challenges: A demonstration using medication terminological systems" [J. Biomed. Inform. (2012) 613-625] , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[18]  M. J. Juvé Udina,et al.  Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy , 2012, ISRN nursing.

[19]  Patricia C. Dykes,et al.  Care coordination gaps due to lack of interoperability in the United States: a qualitative study and literature review , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  Anneke L. Francke,et al.  The development of a nursing subset of patient problems to support interoperability , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[21]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  Combining Lexical and Semantic Methods of Inter-terminology Mapping Using the UMLS , 2007, MedInfo.

[22]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  A survey of nursing documentation, terminologies and standards in European countries , 2012, Nursing Informatics.

[23]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[24]  Karen A Monsen,et al.  Rigor in electronic health record knowledge representation: Lessons learned from a SNOMED CT clinical content encoding exercise , 2014, Informatics for health & social care.