The pendulum swings back: individual acceptance of re-centralized application platforms

After two decades of actively distributing computing power to individual users in the form of desktop and notebook PCs, IT executives are now being drawn back to the benefits of centralized computing platforms, as evidenced by the emergence of thin client technology and the application service provider (ASP) business model. But will individual users embrace this "re-centralization?" This study examines major influencing factors on end-user use of centralized application platforms using the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Two new perceived behavioral control factors are identified: (1) relative functional advantage of the local PC versus the central server, and (2) response promptness of the central server. Data were collected using a paper-and-pencil survey of twenty-six users who had access to a centralized application platform. The two new measures demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, and both were strong predictors of intention to use the centralized platform and actual usage. Results also suggest that TPB has strong predictive power for individual use of centralized application platforms.

[1]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Ritu Agarwal Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies , 2000 .

[5]  Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.  More than a failure? The computerized reservation systems at French Railways , 1996, Inf. Technol. People.

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[8]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  Is eCommerce of IT Application Services (ASP) Alive and Well , 2001 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[15]  H. Wold Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares , 1983 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[19]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  David Schuff,et al.  Centralization vs. decentralization of application software , 2001, CACM.

[21]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[23]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[24]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[25]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .