Left hand movements and right hemisphere activation in unilateral spatial neglect: a test of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis

The aim of the present study was to check one of the main assumptions of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis, namely, the prediction that the severity of neglect should be reduced by conditions activating the right hemisphere. To achieve this, a group of neglect patients was studied using a slightly modified version of the limb activation technique. The (verbal or visuo-spatial) nature of the stimuli to be processed by the patient and the (left or right) side of space where the left hand moved were considered as the critical variables to check the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis. Three traditional and one new methods were used to measure changes induced in the severity of neglect by the material to be processed or by the side of space where the left hand moved. The traditional methods, all based on counting omissions, consisted of measuring: (a) the overall number of omissions; (b) the number of omissions made on the left half sheet; or (c) the difference between the omissions made on the left and right sides of the sheet. The new index, based on the notion of the 'attentional field' and defined as the spatial distribution of stimuli detected by the patient, was operationally measured by computing the distance between each stimulus crossed out by the patient and the right margin of the sheet. The study was conducted by rating the severity of neglect in 42 cancellation sheets which had used, respectively letters (N=21) and small geometric figures (N=21) as targets. The two sets of cancellation sheets were obtained from seven neglect patients during a limb activation task requiring the cancellation of a given target in three different conditions: (a) baseline; (b) active movements of the left hand in the left half space; (c) active movements of the left hand in the right half space. Results were at variance with the predictions based on Kinsbourne's model, since the verbal or visual spatial nature of the material to be processed did not influence the severity of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) and since left hand movements produced a significant reduction in the severity of neglect only when these movements were made on the left side of space.

[1]  H. Karnath,et al.  Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  I. Robertson Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral neglect: three single case studies of its therapeutic effectiveness , 1999 .

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Changes in the symptoms of neglect induced by changing task strategy. , 1978, Archives of neurology.

[4]  John C. Marshall,et al.  How Long is a Piece of String? A Study of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1988, Cortex.

[5]  R. Walker,et al.  Limb activation and the rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: Evidence of task-specific effects , 1999 .

[6]  G. Denes,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: a follow-up study. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[8]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Visual allesthesia in manual pointing: Some evidence for a sensorimotor cerebral organization , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neglect as a neural representation deficit. , 1990, Revue neurologique.

[10]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Active and passive activation of left limbs: Influence on visual and sensory neglect , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  A. Berti,et al.  Neglect as a deficit determined by an imbalance between multiple spatial representations , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  R. Cubelli,et al.  Is one hand always better than two? A replication study , 1999 .

[13]  G Gainotti,et al.  Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  R. Sterzi,et al.  Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Modulation of covert visual attention by hand movement: Evidence from parietal extinction after right-hemisphere damage , 1998 .

[16]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and vibration of neck muscles in neglect , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  S. Cappa,et al.  Temporary Remission of Left Hemianesthesia after Vestibular Stimulation. A Sensory Neglect Phenomenon , 1990, Cortex.

[18]  G. Gainotti Lateralization of Brain Mechanisms Underlying Automatic and Controlled Forms of Spatial Orienting of Attention , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Passive limb movements improve visual neglect , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  K. Lin Right-hemispheric activation approaches to neglect rehabilitation poststroke. , 1996, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  C. Trombly,et al.  Effects of Lateralized Tasks on Unilateral Neglect after Right Cerebral Vascular Accident , 1991 .

[23]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Deficits of position sense, unilateral neglect and optokinetic stimulation , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: The role of hemispace, hand and motor activation , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of neglect: Implications for rehabilitation , 1994 .

[27]  Yves Joanette,et al.  Pointing with left vs right hand in left visual field neglect , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R Tissot,et al.  Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[29]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Spatial neglect : position papers on theory and practice , 1994 .

[30]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[31]  G. Antonucci,et al.  Effect of Optokinetic Stimulation in Patients with Visual Neglect , 1990, Cortex.

[32]  G. Rode,et al.  Négligence de l'espace représenté: mise en évidence par l'évocation mentale de la carte de France. , 1995 .

[33]  H. Karnath,et al.  Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  I. Robertson,et al.  Spatiomotor cueing in unilateral left neglect: three case studies of its therapeutic effects. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[35]  I. Robertson,et al.  One hand is better than two: Motor extinction of left hand advantage in unilateral neglect , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  G. Vallar,et al.  Improvement of left visuo-spatial hemineglect by left-sided transcutaneous electrical stimulation , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  A. Rubens Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect , 1985, Neurology.

[38]  J. Marshall,et al.  Hemispheric activation vs spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: A case study , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  平林 一,et al.  Behavioural Inattention Test--Conventional sub-testsの紹介とその問題点 , 1999 .

[40]  B. Caplan Stimulus Effects in Unilateral Neglect? , 1985, Cortex.

[41]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .