Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods.

For 10 years, it was thought that ultrasound (US) contrast agents could be sufficiently detected and imaged with the conventional imaging techniques, now referred to as fundamental imaging. However, it turned out that fundamental imaging was not sensitive enough to detect the contrast agents in the presence of tissue. New imaging techniques that are based on specific properties of the contrast agents, such as nonlinear and transient scattering, proved to be more sensitive. US contrast imaging modalities used today are fundamental, second harmonic, harmonic power Doppler, and pulse inversion; new modalities, such as release burst and subharmonic imaging are emerging. Second harmonic imaging is still not optimal for perfusion imaging applications. However, in combination with Doppler techniques such as power Doppler, it is one of the most sensitive techniques currently available. A complete understanding of the US-contrast agent interaction is essential for further improvements of current detection methods, and the development of new imaging techniques.

[1]  A. C. Baker,et al.  Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Subharmonic Imaging with Microbubble Contrast Agents: Initial Results , 1999, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  E.I. Cespedes,et al.  Multi-pulse ultrasound contrast imaging based on a decorrelation detection strategy , 1998, 1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).

[4]  T. Porter,et al.  Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Demonstration and potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[5]  Peter N. Burns,et al.  Perfusion imaging with pulse inversion Doppler and microbubble contrast agents: in vivo studies of the myocardium , 1998, 1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).

[6]  Navin C. Nanda,et al.  Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement , 1997, Springer Netherlands.

[7]  K J Parker,et al.  Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Nico de Jong,et al.  SCATTERING PROPERTIES OF ENCAPSULATED GAS BUBBLES AT HIGH ULTRASOUND PRESSURES , 1999 .

[9]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Anthony I. Eller,et al.  Generation of Subharmonics of Order One‐Half by Bubbles in a Sound Field , 1968 .

[11]  N. de Jong,et al.  A new ultrasound contrast imaging approach based on the combination of multiple imaging pulses and a separate release burst , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[13]  F. Moriyasu,et al.  Analysis of flash echo from contrast agent for designing optimal ultrasound diagnostic systems. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation? , 1997, Circulation.

[15]  V. Uhlendorf,et al.  Nonlinear acoustical response of coated microbubbles in diagnostic ultrasound , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[16]  P M Shankar,et al.  Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  J. G. Abbott,et al.  Rationale and derivation of MI and TI--a review. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[19]  Jens M. Hovem,et al.  Experimental observation of subharmonic oscillations in Infoson bubbles , 1996 .

[20]  Peter N. Burns,et al.  Imaging instrumentation for ultrasound contrast agents , 1997 .

[21]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[22]  N de Jong,et al.  Comparison of native and contrast-enhanced harmonic echocardiography for visualization of left ventricular endocardial border. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.