Functional autonomy of distant-acting human enhancers.

Many human genes are associated with dispersed arrays of transcriptional enhancers that regulate their expression in time and space. Studies in invertebrate model systems have suggested that these elements could function as discrete and independent regulatory units, but the in vivo combinatorial properties of vertebrate enhancers remain poorly understood. To explore the modularity and regulatory autonomy of human developmental enhancers, we experimentally concatenated up to four enhancers from different genes and used a transgenic mouse assay to compare the in vivo activity of these compound elements with that of the single modules. In all of the six different combinations of elements tested, the reporter gene activity patterns were additive without signs of interference between the individual modules, indicating that regulatory specificity was maintained despite the presence of closely-positioned heterologous enhancers. Even in cases where two elements drove expression in close anatomical proximity, such as within neighboring subregions of the developing limb bud, the compound patterns did not show signs of cross-inhibition between individual elements or novel expression sites. These data indicate that human developmental enhancers are highly modular and functionally autonomous and suggest that genomic enhancer shuffling may have contributed to the evolution of complex gene expression patterns in vertebrates.

[1]  Klaudia Walter,et al.  Open access, freely available online PLoS BIOLOGY Highly Conserved Non-Coding Sequences Are Associated with Vertebrate Development , 2022 .

[2]  A. Visel,et al.  Ultraconservation identifies a small subset of extremely constrained developmental enhancers , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[3]  M. Groudine,et al.  Targeted deletion of 5'HS1 and 5'HS4 of the beta-globin locus control region reveals additive activity of the DNaseI hypersensitive sites. , 2001, Blood.

[4]  M. Low,et al.  Ancient Exaptation of a CORE-SINE Retroposon into a Highly Conserved Mammalian Neuronal Enhancer of the Proopiomelanocortin Gene , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[5]  M. Nóbrega,et al.  Scanning Human Gene Deserts for Long-Range Enhancers , 2003, Science.

[6]  D. Haussler,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. , 2005, Genome research.

[7]  E. Davidson The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution , 2006 .

[8]  J. Tena,et al.  A functional survey of the enhancer activity of conserved non-coding sequences from vertebrate Iroquois cluster gene deserts. , 2005, Genome research.

[9]  J. Burch,et al.  Regulation of GATA gene expression during vertebrate development. , 2005, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[10]  E. Davidson,et al.  Developmental expression of synthetic cis-regulatory systems composed of spatial control elements from two different genes. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences , 2006, Nature.

[12]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Building the heart piece by piece: modularity of cis-elements regulating Nkx2-5 transcription. , 1999, Development.

[13]  M. Levine,et al.  Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. , 1994, Genes & development.

[14]  M. Hosoya,et al.  Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb , 2005, Development.

[15]  D. Haussler,et al.  Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome , 2004, Science.

[16]  N. Gostling,et al.  From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design , 2002, Heredity.

[17]  J. Taylor,et al.  Multiple tissue-specific elements control the apolipoprotein E/C-I gene locus in transgenic mice. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  K. Grzeschik,et al.  Human GLI3 Intragenic Conserved Non-Coding Sequences Are Tissue-Specific Enhancers , 2007, PloS one.

[19]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Every enhancer works with every promoter for all the combinations tested: could new regulatory pathways evolve by enhancer shuffling? , 1991, Gene expression.

[20]  David Haussler,et al.  Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A. Visel,et al.  ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers , 2009, Nature.

[22]  J. Rossant,et al.  Inducible expression of an hsp68-lacZ hybrid gene in transgenic mice. , 1989, Development.

[23]  B. Oostra,et al.  A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[24]  J. Banerji,et al.  Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences , 1981, Cell.

[25]  Nicola K. Wilson,et al.  Expression of the leukemia oncogene Lmo2 is controlled by an array of tissue-specific elements dispersed over 100 kb and bound by Tal1/Lmo2, Ets, and Gata factors. , 2009, Blood.

[26]  D. Haussler,et al.  A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon , 2006, Nature.

[27]  R. Britten,et al.  Repetitive and Non-Repetitive DNA Sequences and a Speculation on the Origins of Evolutionary Novelty , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.