Control of minimally constrained cobots

Cobots are devices which use computer-oriented passive constraints to guide an end-effector driven by a human. This synergistic union of human skill and robotic precision is desired in fields such as surgical robotics (our application area of interest) where the surgeon would prefer not to hand over control of a procedure to an autonomous robot. Typical cobot designs intrinsically allow at most one degree of freedom of motion, but there are some tasks (such as using a bone saw to cut a plane in knee replacement surgery) where allowing two or more degrees of freedom is desireable. While it is possible to use selective constraint alignment to increase the apparent degrees of freedom of a cobot, this requires more actuators than are strictly necessary for the task, as well as a force sensor to detect the user's intent. We, therefore, introduce here the concept of minimally constrained cobots for multiple degree of freedom (DOF) tasks such as planar cutting, and outline a general framework for controlling such devices. We illustrate our control algorithms by using a planar cart example and discuss how they might be applied to potential designs for three-dimensional parallel cobots intended for surgical applications. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Gauging Clinical Practice: Surgical Navigation for Total Hip Replacement , 1998, MICCAI.

[3]  Antony J. Hodgson,et al.  A model-independent definition of attractor behavior applicable to interactive tasks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[4]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted knee surgical total replacement , 1997, CVRMed.

[5]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The effect of alignment of the implant on fractures of the patella after condylar total knee arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  J. Rand,et al.  Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  Cobots: a novel material handling technology , 1998 .

[8]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  The Concept and Implementation of a Passive Trajectory Enhancing Robot , 1996 .

[9]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A general framework for cobot control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  J. E. Colgate,et al.  Cobots: Robots for Collaboration With Human Operators , 1996, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[11]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Semi-active guiding systems in surgery. A two-dof prototype of the passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC) , 1996 .

[12]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Development of a robot with optimized kinematics for the treatment of bone structures , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  B L Davies,et al.  Active compliance in robotic surgery—the use of force control as a dynamic constraint , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of a 3R cobot using continuous variable transmissions , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).