User-Centered Technology in Participatory Culture: Two Decades “Beyond a Narrow Conception of Usability Testing”

Twenty years after the publication of Patricia Sullivan's ldquoBeyond a narrow conception of usability testingrdquo in the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, three scholars - all Sullivan's students - reflect on the history and development of usability testing and research. Following Sullivan, this article argues that usability bridges the divide between science and rhetoric and asserts that usability is most effective when it respects the knowledge-making practices of a variety of disciplines. By interrogating trends in usability method, the authors argue for a definition of usability that relies on multiple epistemologies to triangulate knowledge-making. The article opens with a brief history of the development of usability methods and argues that usability requires a balance between empirical observation and rhetoric. Usability interprets human action and is enriched by articulating context and accepting contingency. Usability relies on effective collaboration and cooperation among stakeholders in the design of technology. Ultimately, professional and technical communication scholars are best prepared to coin new knowledge with a long and wide view of usability.

[1]  IEEE transactions on professional communication , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[2]  K. LeFevre,et al.  Invention as a Social Act , 1986 .

[3]  A. Feenberg Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited , 2002 .

[4]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Usability Science. I: Foundations , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  S. Rosenbaum,et al.  Usability evaluations versus usability testing: when and why? , 1989 .

[6]  B. Latour Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[7]  Patricia Sullivan,et al.  Opening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research Practices , 1997 .

[8]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  Audience involved: Toward a participatory model of writing , 1997 .

[9]  Fred Kemp The User-Friendly Fallacy. , 1987 .

[10]  A. Malhotra,et al.  Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory , 1995 .

[11]  John B. Gilmer,et al.  Support to decision makers: the use of recursive simulation to support decisionmaking , 2003, WSC '03.

[12]  Stephen Schneider Usable Pedagogies: Usability, Rhetoric, and Sociocultural Pedagogy in the Technical Writing Classroom , 2005 .

[13]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[14]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[15]  Ken Baake,et al.  Review of Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing , 2002 .

[16]  Pelle Ehn Manifesto for a digital bauhaus , 1998, Digit. Creativity.

[17]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Ann Brady,et al.  Rhetorical Research: Toward a User-Centered Approach , 2004 .

[19]  Martha Wetterhall Thomas,et al.  Book Review : Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing , 2000 .

[20]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  The Methodology of Participatory Design , 2005 .

[21]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management , 1990 .

[22]  R. Sellars Rhetoric , 1996, The Classical Review.

[23]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts , 1998 .

[24]  H. M. Shih,et al.  The history of human factors and ergonomics , 2000 .

[25]  Morten Kyng Scandanavian design: users in product development , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[26]  Menno De Jong,et al.  An Analysis of Two Successive Plus-Minus Evaluation Studies , 2006 .

[27]  Jürgen Ziegler,et al.  Intuitive Human-Computer Interaction-Toward a User-Friendly Information Society , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  W. Bodmer Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[29]  Dietha Rijnks,et al.  Dynamics of Iterative Reader Feedback , 2006 .

[30]  Jonathan Arnowitz,et al.  Usability as science , 2005, INTR.

[31]  W. L. Sumner The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution , 1959, Nature.

[32]  M. Gerber Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 2005 .

[33]  Patricia Sullivan Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing , 1989 .

[34]  Harry Collins,et al.  The one culture? : a conversation about science , 2001 .

[35]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity , 1996 .

[36]  Robert J. Connors,et al.  The Rise of Technical Writing Instruction in America , 1982, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication.

[37]  Roger A. Grice,et al.  A discussion of modes and motives for usability evaluation , 1989 .

[38]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Tracing Genres through Organizations: A Sociocultural Approach to Information Design , 2003 .

[39]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management , 1990 .