Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: evidence from a three-country study

This study sets out to explore human resource management (HRM) practices in multinational corporation (MNC) subsidiaries within an institutional theory framework. Based on a sample of 158 subsidiaries of MNCs operating in the United States, Russia and Finland, the paper examines factors hypothesised to influence the HRM practices adapted in US, Japanese and European MNC subsidiaries located in Russia, Finland and the US. The results indicate significant differences in HRM practices used across host countries. Both the status of the subsidiary human resource department and the degree to which the subsidiary was involved in knowledge transfer with other parts of the MNC had a significant impact on the selection of HRM practices.

[1]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  Detelin S. Elenkov.  Can American Management Concepts Work in Russia , 1998 .

[4]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders , 2003 .

[5]  C. E. Fey,et al.  A Comparison of Human Resource Management in Russia, China, and Finland , 2004 .

[6]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[7]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[8]  J. Benson,et al.  Convergence and Divergence in Asian Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  National differences in incentive compensation practices: The differing roles of financial performance measurement in the United States and the Netherlands , 2009 .

[10]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[11]  Yuan Lu,et al.  Institutionalization and Bargaining Power Explanations of HRM Practices in International Joint Ventures — The Case of Chinese-Western Joint Ventures , 2001 .

[12]  M. Wright,et al.  Insider ownership, human resource strategies and performance in a transition economy , 2003 .

[13]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[14]  Stanislav Shekshnia,et al.  Western multinationals' human resource practices in Russia , 1998 .

[15]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[16]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  Human Resource Department Power and Influence Through Symbolic Action , 1997 .

[18]  Dave Ulrich,et al.  Human Resource Roles: Creating Value, Not Rhetoric , 1996 .

[19]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  An integrative framework for understanding cross-national human resource management practices , 2002 .

[20]  John Purcell,et al.  Best practice and best fit: chimera or cul‐de‐sac? , 1999 .

[21]  D. Eleanor Westney,et al.  Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[22]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  High performance work systems and firm performance , 1995 .

[23]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Environments and the Multinational Enterprise , 1991 .

[24]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[25]  J. Lawler,et al.  Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy , 2000 .

[26]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[27]  W Zhang,et al.  Country and organizational-level adaptation to foreign workplace ideologies: a comparative study of distributive justice values in China, Russia and the United States , 2003 .

[28]  Ruth C. May,et al.  Transferring management knowledge to Russia: A culturally based approach , 2005 .

[29]  Carol Bormann Young,et al.  Lessons from Russian human resource management experience , 1998 .

[30]  U. Zander.  Exploiting a technical edge : voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology , 1991 .

[31]  Catherine Truss,et al.  Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes , 2001 .

[32]  Yanni Yan.  A comparative study of human resource management practices in international joint ventures: the impact of national origin , 2003 .

[33]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Compensating Local Employees in Post-Communist Russia , 1994 .

[34]  J. Child,et al.  International mergers and acquisitions in the UK 1985-94: a comparison of national HRM practices , 2002 .

[35]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[36]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Managing Russian Factory Workers: The Impact of U.S.–Based Behavioral and Participative Techniques , 1993 .

[37]  Jean-Louis Barsoux,et al.  The global challenge : frameworks for international human resource management , 2006 .

[38]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[39]  Johngseok Bae,et al.  Variations in human resource management in Asian countries: MNC home-country and host-country effects , 1998 .

[40]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[41]  Schon Beechler,et al.  The Transfer of Japanese-Style Management to American Subsidiaries: Constraints, and Competencies , 1994 .

[42]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[43]  Detelin S. Elenkov.  Can American Management Concepts Work in Russia? A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study , 1998 .

[44]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[45]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Comparing Line and HR Executives' Perceptions of HR Effectiveness: Services, Roles, and Contributions , 2001 .

[46]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[47]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory , 1996 .

[48]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Human resource practices and firm performance of multinational corporations: influences of country origin , 1998 .

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[50]  David Guest,et al.  Human resource management: when research confronts theory , 2001 .

[51]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[52]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  Beginning to Unlock the Black Box in the HR Firm Performance Relationship: The Impact of HR Practices on Employee Attitudes and Employee Outcomes , 2001 .

[53]  Terence Jackson,et al.  The management of people across cultures: Valuing people differently , 2002 .

[54]  Xavier Coller,et al.  Transnational Management Influence over Changing Employment Practice: A Case from the Food Industry , 1998 .

[55]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science , 2005 .

[56]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[57]  A. Tsui.  3 – A Multiple-Constituency Framework of Managerial Reputational Effectiveness* , 1984 .

[58]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[59]  Michael J. Pisani,et al.  New criticisms of international management: An analytical review , 2008 .

[60]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[61]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The role of human resource practices in petro-chemical refinery performance , 1999 .

[62]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  IMPROVING LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DO MATTER , 1996 .

[63]  L. Gratton,et al.  Paying the piper: choice and constraint in changing HR functional roles , 2002 .

[64]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Competitive advantage through people : unleashing the power of the work force , 1995 .

[65]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[66]  P. Almond,et al.  Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals , 2005 .

[67]  Michael G. Harvey,et al.  The changing role of the corporate HR function in global organizations of the twenty-first century , 2001 .

[68]  K. Starkey,et al.  In search of the changing role of the corporate human resource function in the international firm , 2000 .

[69]  Jean-Louis Barsoux,et al.  Managing Across Cultures , 1997 .

[70]  Daniel J. McCarthy,et al.  Finding the Common Ground in Russian and American Business Ethics , 1995 .

[71]  Carl F. Fey,et al.  The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on MNC Subsidiary Performance in Russia , 2000 .

[72]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[73]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[74]  Kenneth Husted,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Hostility in Russian Firms , 2003 .

[75]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[76]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Influences on Human Resource Management Practices in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[77]  Nancy K. Napier,et al.  Toward an Integrative Model of Strategic International Human Resource Management , 1996 .

[78]  Carl F. Fey,et al.  Effective human resource management practices for foreign firms in Russia , 1999 .

[79]  D. Bowen,et al.  The Role of Human Resource Management: An Exploratory Study of Cross‐Country Variance , 2002 .

[80]  J. N. Cleveland,et al.  Localization in human resource management: Comparing American and European multinational corporations , 2002 .

[81]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[82]  G. Martin,et al.  Diffusing 'best practice' in multinational firms: prospects, practice and contestation , 1998 .

[83]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[84]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[85]  Robin Kramar,et al.  PAUL EVANS, VLADIMIR PUCIK and JEAN‐LOUIS BARSOUX. 2002. The global challenge: Frameworks for international human resource management , 2004 .

[86]  Ing-Chung Huang,et al.  International Human Resource Strategy and Its Determinants: The Case of Subsidiaries in Taiwan , 1995 .

[87]  Javier Quintanilla,et al.  Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity or a process of 'Anglo-Saxonization' , 1998 .

[88]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[89]  J. Milliman,et al.  The impact of National Culture on HRM Practices: The Case of Performance Appraisal , 1998 .

[90]  M. Brooke,et al.  The strategy of multinational enterprise , 1970 .

[91]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[92]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[93]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: A Subsidiary Perspective , 2000 .