Sampling skinks and geckos in artificial cover objects in a dry mixed grassland-shrubland with mammalian predator control

Introduced mammalian predators threaten populations of endemic New Zealand lizards but their effects on lizard populations have not been quantified on the mainland. We trialled the use of artificial cover objects (ACOs) for sampling small terrestrial lizards (the skinks Oligosoma maccanni, O. nigriplantare polychroma and O. inconspicuum, and gecko Hoplodactylus maculatus) in three experimental mammal-management treatments: a mammal-proof fence, two sites in an intensive mammal-removal area, and an experimental control site with no mammal removal. These predator control regimes were established in 2005-2006 to protect endangered grand skinks (O. grande) and Otago skinks (O. otagense) at Macraes Flat, North Otago. We (1) counted skinks and geckos found under ACOs on a single day and compared these counts between treatments, and (2) estimated lizard population sizes (N) based on capture-mark-recapture (CMR) of lizards under ACOs in daily and weekly sampling sessions. Our results provide baseline data of the abundance of the small lizard species shortly after implementation of predator management. Single-day counts of skinks were significantly higher inside the mammal fence compared with the experimental control. No consistent differences were found between the other treatments. Significantly more skinks were counted in gully habitats than in ridge habitats. , counts of skinks from the first day of CMR, and the total number of individuals caught were correlated, but these relationships must be validated with independent data. Few geckos were caught unless ACOs were placed near rock outcrops. Only two skinks but 25% of geckos moved between adjacent ACOs (5-m spacing). The recapture rate of skinks was low; captures declined when ACOs were checked daily but not when they were checked weekly. Because of potential biases of these methods, we propose to compare counts in ACOs and based on CMR in ACOs with based on CMR in pitfall traps with 3-m spacing.

[1]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[2]  C. Daugherty,et al.  Four new species and one new subspecies of skinks, genus Leiolopisma (Reptilia: Lacertilia: Scincidae) from New Zealand , 1990 .

[3]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Adding burrows to enhance a population of the endangered pygmy blue tongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis , 2004 .

[4]  C. Reading.  A proposed standard method for surveying reptiles on dry lowland heath , 1997 .

[5]  D. MacKenzie.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[6]  D. Marsh,et al.  Monitoring Terrestrial Salamanders: Biases Caused by Intense Sampling and Choice of Cover Objects , 2003 .

[7]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Population estimation with sparse data: the role of estimators versus indices revisited , 2001 .

[8]  Theodore R. Simons,et al.  Sampling plethodontid salamanders : Sources of variability , 2001 .

[9]  A. Olsen,et al.  Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources , 2004 .

[10]  M. Hunter,et al.  An Evaluation of the Artificial Cover Object (ACO) Method for Monitoring Populations of the Redback Salamander Plethodon cinereus , 2000 .

[11]  C. Frampton,et al.  A practical technique for non‐destructive monitoring of soil surface invertebrates for ecological restoration programmes , 2004 .

[12]  D. M. Wotton.  Effectiveness of the common gecko (Hoplodactylus maculatus) as a seed disperser on Mana Island, New Zealand , 2002 .

[13]  R. Huggins.  On the statistical analysis of capture experiments , 1989 .

[14]  M. Tocher,et al.  Conservation of lizards in Otago Conservancy , 2007 .

[15]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[16]  A. Cree.  Low annual reproductive output in female reptiles from New Zealand , 1994 .

[17]  S. Pledger.  Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[18]  Impact of agricultural development on grand skink ( Oligosoma grande ) ( Reptilia : Scincidae ) populations at Macraes Flat , 2005 .

[19]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  ADVANCED FEATURES OF PROGRAM MARK , 2002 .

[20]  Gary C. White,et al.  Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities , 2005 .

[21]  K. Pollock.  A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture , 1982 .

[22]  K. Pollock.  The use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture modelling: An overview , 2002 .

[23]  C. King,et al.  The handbook of New Zealand mammals , 1990 .

[24]  G. Elliott.  EFFECTS OF HABITAT STRUCTURE ON DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF LIZARDS AT PUKERUA BAY, WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND , 1996 .

[25]  A. Freeman.  Comparative ecology of two Oligosoma skinks in coastal Canterbury: a contrast with Central Otago , 1997 .

[26]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[27]  R. Huggins.  Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments , 1991 .

[28]  D. M. Ha,et al.  A gentle introduction , 2006 .

[29]  Stanley H. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Small‐Mammal Population Size , 1988 .

[30]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[31]  Indexes as surrogates to abundance for low-abundance species , 2004 .

[32]  D. Towns,et al.  From small Maria to massive Campbell: Forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands , 2003 .

[33]  B. Patrick,et al.  Use of artificial cover objects for detecting red katipo, Latrodectus katipo Powell (Araneae: Theridiidae) , 2006 .

[34]  Paul B Conn,et al.  Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[36]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  DENSITY: software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[37]  J. Alho.  Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. , 1990, Biometrics.

[38]  Lee R. Dice,et al.  Some Census Methods for Mammals , 1938 .

[39]  M. Lettink.  SHORT COMMUNICATION Detectability, movements and apparent lack of homing in Hoplodactylus maculatus (Reptilia: Diplodactylidae) following translocation , 2007 .

[40]  John Seidensticker,et al.  Comparison of population estimators for medium-sized mammals , 1991 .

[41]  N. Slade,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF USING COUNTS OF INDIVIDUALS CAPTURED AS INDICES OF POPULATION SIZE , 2000 .

[42]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[43]  D. Newman,et al.  Effects of a mouse, Mus musculus, eradication programme and habitat change on lizard populations of Mana Island, New Zealand, with special reference to McGregor's skink, Cyclodina macgregori , 1994 .

[44]  J. Norris,et al.  NONPARAMETRIC MLE UNDER TWO CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS WITH HETEROGENEITY , 1996 .

[45]  A. Cree,et al.  Relative use of three types of artificial retreats by terrestrial lizards in grazed coastal shrubland, New Zealand , 2007 .

[46]  R. Shine,et al.  Shelter-site use by five species of montane scincid lizards in south-eastern Australia , 2003 .

[47]  M. Efford.  Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[48]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .