Differences between human auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) measured at 2 and 4 months after birth.

Infant auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) show a series of marked changes during the first year of life. These AERP changes indicate important advances in early development. The current study examined AERP differences between 2- and 4-month-old infants. An auditory oddball paradigm was delivered to infants with a frequent repetitive tone and three rare auditory events. The three rare events included a shorter than the regular inter-stimulus interval (ISI-deviant), white noise segments, and environmental sounds. The results suggest that the N250 infantile AERP component emerges during this period in response to white noise but not to environmental sounds, possibly indicating a developmental step towards separating acoustic deviance from contextual novelty. The scalp distribution of the AERP response to both the white noise and the environmental sounds shifted towards frontal areas and AERP peak latencies were overall lower in infants at 4 than at 2 months of age. These observations indicate improvements in the speed of sound processing and maturation of the frontal attentional network in infants during this period.

[1]  Warren H Meck,et al.  Timing in the baby brain. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Marijke A. K. A. Braeken,et al.  Detecting violations of temporal regularities in waking and sleeping two-month-old infants , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[4]  A. Friederici,et al.  Neural manifestation of cognitive and precognitive mismatch detection in early infancy , 2002, Neuroreport.

[5]  Naseem Choudhury,et al.  The importance of rapid auditory processing abilities to early language development: evidence from converging methodologies. , 2002, Developmental psychobiology.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language or music, mother or Mozart? Structural and environmental influences on infants’ language networks , 2010, Brain and Language.

[7]  Chao He,et al.  Mismatch Responses to Pitch Changes in Early Infancy , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Common Neural Basis for Phoneme Processing in Infants and Adults , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  G. Csibra,et al.  Electrophysiological Methods in Studying Infant Cognitive Development , 2009 .

[11]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of the auditory event-related potentials during the first year of life , 2002, Neuroreport.

[12]  M. Huotilainen,et al.  Auditory event-related potentials at preschool age in children born very preterm , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[14]  István Winkler,et al.  Separating acoustic deviance from novelty during the first year of life: a review of event-related potential evidence , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[15]  B. Vohr,et al.  Preterm birth and the developing brain , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  K. Eklund,et al.  Maturational effects on newborn ERPs measured in the mismatch negativity paradigm , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[17]  R Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of mismatch negativity in infants. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: Effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  M. Huotilainen,et al.  Cortical auditory event-related potentials in newborn infants. , 2006, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[21]  P. Huttenlocher.  Synapse elimination and plasticity in developing human cerebral cortex. , 1984, American journal of mental deficiency.

[22]  K. Eklund,et al.  Brain Responses to Changes in Speech Sound Durations Differ Between Infants With and Without Familial Risk for Dyslexia , 2002, Developmental neuropsychology.

[23]  I. Winkler,et al.  Processing acoustic change and novelty in newborn infants , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Mapping Infant Brain Myelination with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of the auditory change detection response in infants: a longitudinal ERP study , 2002, Neuroreport.

[26]  April A. Benasich,et al.  Brain responses to tonal changes in the first two years of life , 2006, Brain and Development.

[27]  Gábor P. Háden,et al.  Context effects on processing widely deviant sounds in newborn infants , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[28]  N Cowan,et al.  The development of auditory attention in children. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[29]  Valerie L. Shafer,et al.  Maturation of Mismatch Negativity in Typically Developing Infants and Preschool Children , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[30]  S. Zoia,et al.  Rhythm perception and production predict reading abilities in developmental dyslexia , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Atypical Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Preterm Infants during the First Year of Life: A Possible Sign of Cognitive Dysfunction? , 2004, Pediatric Research.

[32]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Context Effects , 2003 .