Divergent Approaches to Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Infections Across the European Union

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize partner notification (PN) policy and practice for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the European Union (EU) and Norway. Goal: The goal of this study was to promote European good practice in PN. Study: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire to national STI surveillance leads. Results: Considerable heterogeneity exists in approaches to PN. In 2 countries, PN is compulsory for notifiable STIs; and in 13, it is voluntary. Most countries use patient referral but 5 of 15 also offer provider referral. Activity level varies by country and disease. Etiologic treatment of contacts is most common; 5 usually offer epidemiologic treatment and patient-expedited treatment is unusual. Similarities exist with provision mainly by specialized STI treatment services for bacterial STIs. Conclusions: This divergence in approach calls for the setting of minimum standards for PN delivery together with mechanisms for establishing and sharing best practice. Further research must identify monitoring systems for inclusion in routine surveillance.

[1]  K. Fenton,et al.  Recent trends in the epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in the European Union , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[2]  K. Fenton,et al.  Surveillance systems for STIs in the European Union: facing a changing epidemiology , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[3]  Margaret-Mary G. Wilson,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases. , 2003, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[4]  Gale R. Burstein,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines , 2003, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[5]  K. Holmes,et al.  Partner Notification for HIV and STD in the United States:: Low Coverage for Gonorrhea, Chlamydial Infection, and HIV , 2003, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  Patient-Delivered Partner Treatment With Azithromycin to Prevent Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Among Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2003, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[7]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  The role of self-efficacy and relationship quality in partner notification by adolescents with sexually transmitted infections. , 2002, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  J. S. St. Lawrence,et al.  STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[9]  R. Rothenberg.  The transformation of partner notification. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  J. Bingham.  Services for sexually transmitted infections in Europe and central Asia. , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[11]  U. Laukamm-Josten,et al.  A survey of STI policies and programmes in Europe: preliminary results , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[12]  A. Nicoll,et al.  Are trends in HIV, gonorrhoea, and syphilis worsening in western Europe? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  K. Workowski,et al.  SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES TREATMENT GUIDELINES 2002 , 2002, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[14]  A. Oxman,et al.  A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS , 2002, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[15]  F. Gruber,et al.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in eastern Europe: legal aspects, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[16]  K. Holmes,et al.  Partner Management for Gonococcal and Chlamydial Infection: Expansion of Public Health Services to the Private Sector and Expedited Sex Partner Treatment Through a Partnership With Commercial Pharmacies , 2001, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[17]  A. Iversen,et al.  Surfing with spirochaetes: an ongoing syphilis outbreak in Brighton , 2001, Sexually transmitted infections.

[18]  Radcliffe Kw.  Introduction. European STD guidelines. , 2001 .

[19]  J. Giesecke,et al.  Europe-wide surveillance for sexually transmitted infections: a timely and appropriate intervention. , 2001, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[20]  P. Watson,et al.  Using a national guideline: an audit of the management of gonorrhoea in Newcastle upon Tyne , 2000, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[21]  B. A. Macke,et al.  Partner notification in the United States: an evidence-based review. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  K. Holmes,et al.  Partner notification for chlamydial infections among private sector clinicians in Seattle-King County: a clinician and patient survey. , 1999, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[23]  E. Curless,et al.  Outcome of Contact Tracing for Chlamydia Trachomatis in a District General Hospital , 1999, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[24]  A. Ghani,et al.  Partner notification for gonorrhoea: a comparative study with a provincial and a metropolitan UK clinic. , 1998, Sexually transmitted infections.

[25]  K. Radcliffe,et al.  Contact tracing--where do we go from here? , 1998, Sexually transmitted infections.

[26]  T. Farley,et al.  Effectiveness of patient delivered partner medication for preventing recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis. , 1998, Sexually transmitted infections.

[27]  R. Eitrem,et al.  Contact Tracing for Genital Chlamydia trachomatis in a Swedish County , 1998, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[28]  F. Olesen,et al.  Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in general practice: diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and contact tracing. , 1998, Family practice.

[29]  J Clarke,et al.  Contact tracing for chlamydia: data on effectiveness , 1998, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[30]  J. Ross,et al.  Sixth European Conference on Clinical Aspects and Treatment of HIV Infection, Hamburg, Germany, 11-15 October 1997. , 1998, Sexually transmitted infections.

[31]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and Chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  A. Johnson,et al.  The role and effectiveness of partner notification in STD control: a review. , 1996, Genitourinary medicine.

[33]  A. Oxman,et al.  Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases: an overview of the evidence. , 1994, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[34]  V. Goulet,et al.  Surveillance of sexually transmitted diseases in France: recent trends and incidence. , 1994, Genitourinary medicine.

[35]  P. Aavitsland,et al.  [Contact tracing routines for genital chlamydia infections used by Norwegian physicians. A questionnaire study]. , 1992, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[36]  B. Katz,et al.  Compliance with Antibiotic Therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae , 1992, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[37]  L. Forssman,et al.  Contact Tracing in the Control of Genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection , 1991, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[38]  J. Yorke,et al.  Gonorrhea Transmission Dynamics and Control , 1984 .

[39]  R. Kilduffe.  The Next Great Plague to go , 1942 .

[40]  K. Radcliffe.  Introduction. European STD guidelines. , 2001, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[41]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Where do people go for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases? , 1999, Family planning perspectives.

[42]  M. Blaxter.  AIDS: Worldwide Policies and Problems , 1991 .