Over the last few years the methods and techniques used in sociolinguistics have aroused keen interest and have continually been improved. Yet the claims that have been made about differences of degree between the language used by women and that used by men are often based on research methods which seem to be anything but reliable. On the basis of a corpus of 587 utterances produced in buying a train ticket, an investigation was made of whether there is a statistically significant difference between women and men in certain aspects of their language use which have been mentioned in the literature: the number of words used to deal with a set task, diminutives, civilities, forms of language expressing insecurity (repetitions, hesitations, self-corrections, requests for information). In addition to the independent variable of sex of speaker, three other variables were introduced: sex of addressee, age of speaker, and time of ticket purchase (rush-hour or normal). The results of our investigation indicate that there are few significant differences between the language used by women and that used by men in this particular situation, with regard to the variables mentioned above. As a consequence, this investigation has demonstrated once again that intuitions should be considered critically. It is remarkable, however, that sex of addressee seems to affect almost all of the variables under consideration. Consequently, the results strongly suggest that anyone who wants to investigate language by means of interviews must take into account the fact that the kind [i] This article interprets the results of an investigation carried out by the members of the seminar on 'Language and sex', held at the Institute of General Linguistics of the Uni
[1]
P. Trudgill.
Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich
,
1972,
Language in Society.
[2]
Betty Lou Dubois,et al.
The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they?↓
,
1975,
Language in Society.
[3]
D. Entwisle,et al.
Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular.@@@Sociolinguistic Patterns.
,
1975
.
[4]
N. J. Spencer,et al.
Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability
,
1973,
Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[5]
Mary Ritchie Key,et al.
Male/female language
,
1975
.
[6]
The Use of Expletives by Some American Women.
,
1975
.
[7]
B. Thorne.
Language and Woman's Place. Robin Lakoff
,
1976
.
[8]
Nessa Wolfson,et al.
Speech events and natural speech: some implications for sociolinguistic methodology
,
1976,
Language in Society.
[9]
Shirley A. Star,et al.
Age and Sex in the Interview
,
1956,
American Journal of Sociology.
[10]
Sidney Greenbaum,et al.
Elicitation experiments in English: Linguistic studies in use and attitude,
,
1970
.
[11]
Donald M. Taylor,et al.
Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data
,
1973,
Language in Society.
[12]
William Labov,et al.
Some principles of linguistic methodology
,
1972,
Language in Society.