ALA induced photodynamic effects on Gram positive and negative bacteria

In the present study we examined the production of high amounts of porphyrins upon induction by delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in 9 bacterial strains. This was performed by solely inducing the porphyrin biosynthesis pathway. Four of the strains were Gram positive bacteria and five were Gram negative strains. All strains, except Streptococcus faecalis, produced porphyrins when incubated in PBS with 0.38 mM ALA for 4 h. Excess porphyrin production was excreted to the medium. Gram positive bacteria exhibited fluorescent emission peaks at 622 nm for the endogenous and 617 nm for the excreted porphyrins. Gram negative bacteria exhibited a 630 nm emission peak for the endogenous and a 615 nm emission peak for the excreted extracellular porphyrins. Upon illumination of the ALA induced Staphylococcal strains with 407-420 nm blue light, a decrease of five orders of magnitude was demonstrated with a light dose of 50 J cm(-2). Total eradication of the Staphylococcal strains could be achieved with a 100 J cm(-2) dose, which resulted in a decrease in viability of seven orders of magnitude. The viability of all the induced Gram negative strains and B. cereus decreased by one or two orders of magnitude upon illumination with 50 and 100 J cm(-2), respectively. This difference in the photoinactivation rate was found to be due to the distribution and amounts of the various porphyrins in the bacterial strains. The predominant porphyrin in the Staphylococcal strains was coproporphyrin (68.3-74.6%). In the Gram negative strains there was no predominant porphyrin and the porphyrins found were mostly 5-carboxyporphyrin, uroporphyrin, 7- carboxyporphyrin, coproporphyrin and protoporphyrin. In the B. cereus(Gram positive) strain the predominant porphyrin was uroporphyrin (75.8%). Although the total production of porphyrins in the Gram negative bacteria was higher than in the Staphylococcal strains, the amount of coproporphyrin produced by the latter was twice to three times higher than in the Gram negative strains. The extracellular excreted porphyrins did not contribute to the photoinactivation in any of the tested strains. Significant decreases in the Na(+) and K(+) content were detected in induced S. aureus after illumination while only small changes were observed in E. coli B. The green fluorescent protein within the cytoplasm of induced E. coli strains was only partially disrupted (by 60% only). These results indicate a partial yield of the effects generated by (1)O(2) radicals resulting from the photoinactivation of Gram negative bacteria and a successful generation of the same effects in the Staphylococcal strains.

[1]  K. T. Holland,et al.  The microaerophily and photosensitivity of Propionibacterium acnes. , 1994, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[2]  Zvi Malik,et al.  Photodynamic effects of deuteroporphyrin on Gram-positive bacteria , 1987, Current Microbiology.

[3]  Á. Villanueva,et al.  Meso-substituted cationic porphyrins as efficient photosensitizers of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. , 1996, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[4]  J. T. Magee,et al.  Clinical significance of the emergence of bacterial resistance in the hospital environment , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[5]  Y. Nitzan,et al.  Endogenous Porphyrin Production in Bacteria by δ-Aminolaevulinic Acid and Subsequent Bacterial Photoeradication , 1999, Lasers in Medical Science.

[6]  P. Maillard,et al.  Photobiological activity of exogenous and endogenous porphyrin derivatives in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus hirae cells , 2001, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[7]  Y. Nitzan,et al.  Photoinactivation of Deinococcus radiodurans: An Unusual Gram‐Positive Microorganism , 1999 .

[8]  Tayyaba Hasan,et al.  Targeted Antimicrobial Photochemotherapy , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  J. V. van Lier,et al.  Photosensitizing activity of water- and lipid-soluble phthalocyanines on Escherichia coli. , 1990, FEMS microbiology letters.

[10]  Zvi Malik,et al.  Antimicrobial and antiviral activity of porphyrin photosensitization , 1994, Other Conferences.

[11]  Z. Malik,et al.  STRUCTURE‐ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP OF PORPHINES FOR PHOTOINACTIVATION OF BACTERIA , 1995, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[12]  Z. Malik,et al.  INACTIVATION OF GRAM‐NEGATIVE BACTERIA BY PHOTOSENSITIZED PORPHYRINS , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[13]  E. Reddi,et al.  Photosensitization of wild and mutant strains of Escherichia coli by meso-tetra (N-methyl-4-pyridyl)porphine. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[14]  Z. Malik,et al.  Effect of photoactivated hematoporphyrin derivative on the viability ofStaphylococcus aureus , 1983, Current Microbiology.

[15]  L. Alphen,et al.  Photodynamic destruction of Haemophilus parainfluenzae by endogenously produced porphyrins. , 1997, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[16]  Z. Malik,et al.  Collapse of K+ and ionic balance during photodynamic inactivation of leukemic cells, erythrocytes and Staphylococcus aureus. , 1993, The International journal of biochemistry.

[17]  J C Kennedy,et al.  Endogenous protoporphyrin IX, a clinically useful photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[18]  G. Jori,et al.  HEMATOPORPHYRIN‐SENSITIZED PHOTOINACTIVATION OF Streptococcus faecalis , 1984, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[19]  G. Csík,et al.  In situ detection of ALA-stimulated porphyrin metabolic products in Escherichia coli B by fluorescence line narrowing spectroscopy. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[20]  Karsten König,et al.  Correlation between porphyrin biosynthesis and photodynamic inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa after incubation with 5-aminolaevulinic amid , 1997 .

[21]  Z. Malik,et al.  Photodynamic inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria: problems and possible solutions. , 1992, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[22]  W. Lee,et al.  Comparative studies of porphyrin production in Propionibacterium acnes and Propionibacterium granulosum , 1978, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  J Hanania,et al.  New trends in photobiology (Invited review) bactericidal effects of photoactivated porphyrins ― An alternative approach to antimicrobial drugs , 1990 .

[24]  Z. Malik,et al.  The use of porphyrins for eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in burn wound infections. , 1997, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[25]  Y. Nitzan,et al.  Photodynamic Effects of Antioxidant Substituted Porphyrin Photosensitizers on Gram-positive and -negative Bacteria¶ , 2003 .

[26]  Y. Nitzan,et al.  Photoinactivation of Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli B by a Cationic Hydrophilic Porphyrin at Various Light Wavelengths , 2001, Current Microbiology.

[27]  T. Melø,et al.  Fluorescence from pilosebaceous follicles , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[28]  Zvi Malik,et al.  Eradication of Propionibacterium acnes by its endogenic porphyrins after illumination with high intensity blue light. , 2003, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[29]  J. H. Parish,et al.  Photoinactivation of bacteria. Use of a cationic water-soluble zinc phthalocyanine to photoinactivate both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. , 1996, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.