Test–retest reliability and longitudinal analysis of automated hippocampal subregion volumes in healthy ageing and Alzheimer's disease populations

The hippocampal formation is a complex brain structure that is important in cognitive processes such as memory, mood, reward processing and other executive functions. Histological and neuroimaging studies have implicated the hippocampal region in neuropsychiatric disorders as well as in neurodegenerative diseases. This highly plastic limbic region is made up of several subregions that are believed to have different functional roles. Therefore, there is a growing interest in imaging the subregions of the hippocampal formation rather than modelling the hippocampus as a homogenous structure, driving the development of new automated analysis tools. Consequently, there is a pressing need to understand the stability of the measures derived from these new techniques. In this study, an automated hippocampal subregion segmentation pipeline, released as a developmental version of Freesurfer (v6.0), was applied to T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 22 healthy older participants, scanned on 3 separate occasions and a separate longitudinal dataset of 40 Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Test–retest reliability of hippocampal subregion volumes was assessed using the intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage volume difference and percentage volume overlap (Dice). Sensitivity of the regional estimates to longitudinal change was estimated using linear mixed effects (LME) modelling. The results show that out of the 24 hippocampal subregions, 20 had ICC scores of 0.9 or higher in both samples; these regions include the molecular layer, granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus, CA1, CA3 and the subiculum (ICC > 0.9), whilst the hippocampal fissure and fimbria had lower ICC scores (0.73–0.88). Furthermore, LME analysis of the independent AD dataset demonstrated sensitivity to group and individual differences in the rate of volume change over time in several hippocampal subregions (CA1, molecular layer, CA3, hippocampal tail, fissure and presubiculum). These results indicate that this automated segmentation method provides a robust method with which to measure hippocampal subregions, and may be useful in tracking disease progression and measuring the effects of pharmacological intervention.

[1]  Menno P. Witter,et al.  A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  E. McAuley,et al.  Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Histology-derived volumetric annotation of the human hippocampal subfields in postmortem MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[5]  A. Simmons,et al.  Structural neuroimaging studies in major depressive disorder. Meta-analysis and comparison with bipolar disorder. , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[6]  E. Nestler,et al.  A molecular and cellular theory of depression. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[7]  S. Arnold.  The medial temporal lobe in schizophrenia. , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[8]  Thorsten Bartsch,et al.  The Clinical Neurobiology of the Hippocampus: An integrative view , 2012 .

[9]  B. Ravnkilde,et al.  Hippocampal volume and depression: a meta-analysis of MRI studies. , 2004, The American journal of psychiatry.

[10]  G. Biessels,et al.  Hippocampal subfield volumes at 7T in early Alzheimer's disease and normal aging , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[11]  Gregory McCarthy,et al.  Scan–rescan reliability of subcortical brain volumes derived from automated segmentation , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Duration of illness and treatment effects on hippocampal volume in male patients with schizophrenia , 2005, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Nearly automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields in in vivo focal T2-weighted MRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  N. Schuff,et al.  Measurement of hippocampal subfields and age-related changes with high resolution MRI at 4T , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  MIRIAD—Public release of a multiple time point Alzheimer's MR imaging dataset , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Reliability and statistical power analysis of cortical and subcortical FreeSurfer metrics in a large sample of healthy elderly , 2015, NeuroImage.

[17]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Bayesian longitudinal segmentation of hippocampal substructures in brain MRI using subject-specific atlases , 2016, NeuroImage.

[18]  F. Gage,et al.  Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Heritability and reliability of automatically segmented human hippocampal formation subregions , 2015, NeuroImage.

[20]  Hugo J. Kuijf,et al.  Subfields of the hippocampal formation at 7T MRI: In vivo volumetric assessment , 2012, NeuroImage.

[21]  H. Benali,et al.  Fully automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment applied on data from ADNI , 2009, Hippocampus.

[22]  J. Malberg.  CRSN Symposium : Focus on Depression , Part I Symposium du CRSN : le point sur la dépression , première partie Implications of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in antidepressant action , 2004 .

[23]  H. Soininen,et al.  MRI of the Hippocampus in Alzheimer’s Disease: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Analysis of the Incorrectly Classified Subjects , 1998, Neurobiology of Aging.

[24]  Andrea Klug,et al.  The Hippocampus Book , 2016 .

[25]  Steven C. R. Williams,et al.  Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  N. Schuff,et al.  Hippocampal atrophy patterns in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[29]  M. Mallar Chakravarty,et al.  Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: Towards a harmonized segmentation protocol , 2015, NeuroImage.

[30]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  Andrea Bernasconi,et al.  Multi-contrast submillimetric 3 Tesla hippocampal subfield segmentation protocol and dataset , 2015, Scientific Data.

[32]  G. Šimić,et al.  Volume and number of neurons of the human hippocampal formation in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  N. Schuff,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  P. Horn,et al.  Bayesian longitudinal segmentation of hippocampal substructures in brain MRI using subject-specific atlases , 2016 .

[35]  S. Kühn,et al.  Gray Matter Correlates of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis , 2013, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Advances in high-resolution imaging and computational unfolding of the human hippocampus , 2009, NeuroImage.

[37]  Eric J. Nestler,et al.  Chronic Antidepressant Treatment Increases Neurogenesis in Adult Rat Hippocampus , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models in Practice , 1997 .

[39]  Steven M. Southwick,et al.  Long-term treatment with paroxetine increases verbal declarative memory and hippocampal volume in posttraumatic stress disorder , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[40]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  D J Holt,et al.  In vivo imaging of adult human hippocampal neurogenesis: progress, pitfalls and promise , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.