Comparison of the spending function method and the Christmas tree correction for group sequential trials.

Sequential designs for continuous monitoring can be derived from the theory of a Brownian motion process. In practice, infrequent analyses lead to a discrete monitoring process. In this paper, two methods proposed to correct for discrete monitoring are compared. The methods are used to create procedures similar to both the O'Brien and Fleming test and the triangular test and are compared in terms of the error rates. For the O'Brien and Fleming test, the spending function method is found to achieve the required error rates more accurately than the Christmas tree correction, while for the triangular test, both methods perform as planned.

[1]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[2]  J. Benichou,et al.  A simulation study of three sequential methods for the comparison of two treatment groups when the response criterion is censored. , 1986, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  J. Whitehead,et al.  An improved approximation for calculation of confidence intervals after a sequential clinical trial. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  J. Montaner,et al.  Corticosteroids prevent early deterioration in patients with moderately severe Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[5]  T. Waterston.  FLUIDS FOR DIARRHŒA IN YOUNG CHILDREN , 1977, The Lancet.

[6]  P. Armitage.  Sequential Medical Trials , 1961, Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.].

[7]  J. Whitehead,et al.  A FORTRAN program for the design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. , 1983, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  Peter Armitage,et al.  RESTRICTED SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURES , 1957 .

[9]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests , 1992 .

[10]  H. Deeg,et al.  Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  D. Jones,et al.  The design of a sequential clinical trial for the comparison of two lung cancer treatments. , 1982, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Thomas Sellke,et al.  Sequential analysis of the proportional hazards model , 1983 .

[13]  D. Siegmund.  Sequential Analysis: Tests and Confidence Intervals , 1985 .

[14]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[15]  K Kim,et al.  Confidence intervals following group sequential tests in clinical trials. , 1987, Biometrics.

[16]  T. W. Anderson.  A MODIFICATION OF THE SEQUENTIAL PROBABILITY RATIO TEST TO REDUCE THE SAMPLE SIZE , 1960 .

[17]  J. S. D. Cani,et al.  Group sequential designs using a family of type I error probability spending functions. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.