A–movement and the EPP

The article argues that the EPP should be eliminated. It is shown that in a number of constructions the EPP does not hold at all. Where it does appear to hold, its effects follow from independent mechanisms of the grammar. EPP effects concerning the final landing site of A–movement follow from Case theory. Intermediate [Spec,IP]s are filled as a result of the requirement of successive cyclicity (i.e., locality); otherwise they remain empty, which is unexpected if the EPP were to hold. In particular, intermediate [Spec,IP]s remain empty in constructions involving expletive subjects, which I argue do not move at all. It is also argued that the requirement of successive cyclicity should not be tied to a property of intermediate heads, as in the feature–checking/filled–specifier requirement approach to successive cyclicity, but to a property of the movement itself.

[1]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[2]  Paul M. Postal,et al.  Some defective paradigms , 1992 .

[3]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure , 1981 .

[4]  Susan Rothstein.  The Syntactic Forms of Predication , 2004 .

[5]  Roger Martin,et al.  A minimalist theory of PRO and control , 1996 .

[6]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs , 1999 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky.  Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[8]  Martha McGinnis,et al.  Locality and Inert Case , 1998 .

[9]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[11]  Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir,et al.  Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions , 2003 .

[12]  Anne Lobeck,et al.  Functional Heads as Proper Governors , 1990 .

[13]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Intermediate Adjunction with A-Movement , 2003, Linguistic Inquiry.

[14]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Move α: Conditions on Its Application and Output , 1992 .

[15]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  The Case of Unaccusatives , 1988 .

[16]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  Layers of predication , 1994 .

[17]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Semantic Restrictions in Romance Causatives and the Incorporation Approach , 1996 .

[18]  Cédric Boeckx.  A minimalist view on the passive , 1998 .

[19]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications , 1978 .

[20]  P. Branigan,et al.  Subjects and complementizers , 1992 .

[21]  Chris Collins.  Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition , 1994 .

[22]  H. Ura.  On feature-checking for Wh-traces , 1993 .

[23]  Martha McGinnis,et al.  Variation in the phase structure of applicatives , 2001 .

[24]  Masao Ochi,et al.  Constraints on feature checking , 1999 .

[25]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Bare Phrase Structure , 1994 .

[26]  Sam Gutmann,et al.  Cyclic Computation, A Computationally Efficient Minimalist Syntax , 1999 .

[27]  Richard S. Kayne,et al.  French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle , 1975 .

[28]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  Differentiation and reduction in syntactic theory: A case study , 1990 .

[29]  Jairo Nunes,et al.  The Copy Theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program , 1995 .

[30]  N. Hornstein.  Move! : a minimalist theory of construal , 2000 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[32]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Subjects, Objects, and the EPP , 2001 .

[33]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation , 1991 .

[34]  J. Bobaljik.  Morphosyntax : the syntax of verbal inflection , 1995 .

[35]  Javier Ormazabal,et al.  The syntax of complementation : on the connection between syntactic structure and selection , 1995 .

[36]  H. J. Bennis.  Gaps and Dummies , 1987 .

[37]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[38]  Esther Torrego,et al.  Experiencers and Raising Verbs , 1996 .

[39]  M. Baltin,et al.  Toward a theory of movement rules , 1985 .

[40]  Daiko Takahashi,et al.  Minimality of movement , 1994 .

[41]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[42]  Masao Ochi,et al.  Some consequences of Attract F , 1999 .

[43]  Hong Bae Lee,et al.  Agreement and Movement , 2001 .

[44]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Mechanisms of chain formation , 2001 .

[45]  Masatoshi Koizumi.  Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax , 1998 .

[46]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative Case vs. Locative Gender , 1991 .

[47]  Dominique Sportiche.  A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure , 1988 .

[48]  T. Stowell.  Subjects Across Categories , 1983, The Linguistic Review.

[49]  J. Jónsson.  Clausal architecture and case in Icelandic , 1996 .

[50]  Steven Franks,et al.  Clitics in Slavic , 1998 .

[51]  Željko Bošković,et al.  The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach , 1997 .

[52]  Maria Rita Manzini,et al.  Locality, minimalism and parasitic gaps , 1994 .

[53]  Jeffrey T. Runner,et al.  Noun phrase licensing and interpretation , 1995 .

[54]  Roger Martin,et al.  Null Case and the Distribution of PRO , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[55]  Laurie Zaring,et al.  On the relationship between subject pronouns and clausal arguments , 1994 .

[56]  James Mccloskey.  'There', 'it' and agreement , 1991 .