A Multisite Telemammography System for Remote Management of Screening Mammography: An Assessment of Technical, Operational, and Clinical Issues

ObjectiveThis paper describes a high-quality, multisite telemammography system to enable “almost real-time” remote patient management while the patient remains in the clinic. One goal is to reduce the number of women who would physically need to return to the clinic for additional imaging procedures (termed “recall”) to supplement “routine” imaging of screening mammography.Materials and MethodsMammography films from current and prior (when available) examinations are digitized at three remote sites and transmitted along with other pertinent information across low-level communication systems to the central site. Images are automatically cropped, wavelet compressed, and encrypted prior to transmission to the central site. At the central site, radiologists review and rate examinations on a high-resolution workstation that displays the images, computer-assisted detection results, and the technologist's communication. Intersite communication is provided instantly via a messaging “chat” window.ResultsThe technologists recommended additional procedures at 2.7 times the actual clinical recall rate for the same cases. Using the telemammography system during a series of “off-line” clinically simulated studies, radiologists recommended additional procedures at 1.3 times the actual clinical recall rate. Percent agreement and kappa between the study and actual clinical interpretations were 66.1% and 0.315, respectively. For every physical recall potentially avoided using the telemammography system, approximately one presumed “unnecessary” imaging procedure was recommended.ConclusionRemote patient management can reduce the number of women recalled by as much as 50% without performing an unreasonable number of presumed “unnecessary” procedures.

[1]  S L Lou,et al.  Automatic breast region extraction from digital mammograms for PACS and telemammography applications. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[2]  David Gur,et al.  Subjective assessment of high-level image compression of digitized mammograms , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  D. May,et al.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  N. O'Hare,et al.  Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammography , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J M Tonita,et al.  Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  M. Santed,et al.  Adverse psychological effects in women attending a second-stage breast cancer screening. , 2002, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[9]  T. To,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: Breast Cancer Mortality after 11 to 16 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Screening Trial of Mammography in Women Age 40 to 49 Years , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  K. Lindfors,et al.  False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  Jun Wang,et al.  Full-field direct digital telemammography: technical components, study protocols, and preliminary results , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[12]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  D Gur,et al.  Preliminary clinical evaluation of a high-resolution telemammography system. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[14]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Telemammography: implementation issues. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[16]  L. Venta,et al.  Impact of same-day screening mammography availability: results of a controlled clinical trial. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  Emily White,et al.  Evaluating Organized Breast Cancer Screening Implementation , 2004, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[18]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms , 1997, Signal Process..

[19]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. , 1995, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[21]  M J Schell,et al.  Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  S. Duffy,et al.  Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  David Gur,et al.  Multi-site telemammography system: preliminary assessment of technical and operational issues , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.