Understanding the Business Value of Information Technology Investments: Theoretical Evidence from Alternative Market and Cost Structures

This paper develops a series of two-stage duopoly models of quality- price competition and a series of monopoly models of quality-price choice in order to examine the impact of information technology (IT) investments on firm profit, firm productivity, and consumer welfare. We solve the duopoly and monopoly models for four cost functions, where each function makes a different assumption about the form of the marginal cost of production. These models are used to conduct a two-by-four comparison [(monopoly, duopoly) × (four cost functions)] of the impact of IT investments on economic performance. The analysis reveals that together market structure and cost structure play a critical role in determining the form of the relationship between IT investment and economic measures. Specifically, moving from monopoly to duopoly and moving from zero marginal cost to marginal cost as a function of quality increase the number of economic measures for which the directional effects of IT investment are ambiguous, or depend on model parameter values.

[1]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Strategic Information Technology Investments , 1991, MIS Q..

[3]  James R. Marsden,et al.  Theory of decision support systems portfolio evaluation , 1993, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Qing Hu,et al.  Information Technology Investments and Firms' Performance--A Duopoly Perspective , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[6]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  A. Shaked,et al.  Relaxing price competition through product differentiation , 1982 .

[8]  Matt E. Thatcher The impact of technology on product design, productivity, and profits: a duopoly model of price-quality competition , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence , 2003, CSUR.

[10]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[11]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Quality and Competition , 1998 .

[12]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[13]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .

[14]  Pamela Schmitt,et al.  The Impact of a Marginal Cost Increase on Price and Quality: Theory and Evidence from Airline Market Strikes , 2002 .

[15]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[16]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  An Economic Model of Product Quality and IT Value , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Case Study of Electronic Banking at Meridian Bancorp , 1991 .

[18]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Esther Gal-Or,et al.  Strategic and non-strategic differentiation , 1987 .

[20]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[22]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Contribution of Information Technology to Consumer Welfare , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  The Impact of Technology Investments on a Firm’s Production Efficiency, Product Quality, and Productivity , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .