Disease-free survival of node-positive breast cancer patients. Improved prognostication by cytometrical parameters.

Feulgen stained cytologic samples from 225 node-positive breast cancers were investigated by means of an image analysis system. From each tumor sample, 100 cells were scanned and several DNA, morphometrical and textural parameters were evaluated. The meaning of the cytometric parameters for prediction of distant metastases within five years was investigated by the stepwise Cox regression analysis. Most of the investigated DNA- and morphometrical parameters, as well as one textural feature, showed a significant univariate correlation with the clinical course. In the multivariate approach, the lymph node status (pN) was the strongest prognostic factor, followed by the histogram type, the tumor size (pT) and a textural parameter (heterochromatin area). By the linear combination of these selected variables a multivariate prognostic factor was calculated for each individual patient. Using this factor, the patients could be splitted into four groups according to their risk for distant metastases. For this, the continuous range of the multivariate factor was subdivided so that about 35% of the patients were in the middle groups and about 15% of the patients in each of the border groups with highest and lowest factors, respectively. Thus a low risk group (lowest factors) of node-positive patients could be identified with a 5-year distant recurrence-rate of only 6.5%, as well as a group of patients with a considerably worse prognosis (highest factors) and a distant recurrence-rate of 67%. Therefore, DNA, morphometrical and textural parameters can provide powerful prognostic information in node-positive breast carcinomas. Using the multivariate combination of clinical and relevant cytometrical parameters may allow a more appropriate selection of patients for adjuvant therapy.

[1]  H. Joensuu,et al.  Identification of subgroups with favorable prognosis in breast cancer. , 1992, Acta oncologica.

[2]  J. Baak,et al.  The Multivariate Prognostic Index and nuclear DNA content are independent prognostic factors in primary breast cancer patients. , 1989, Cytometry.

[3]  V. Kosma,et al.  DNA flow cytometry, nuclear morphometry, mitotic indices and steroid receptors as independent prognostic factors in female breast cancer , 1992, International journal of cancer.

[4]  T. Caspersson,et al.  Prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in mammary adenocarcinomas in humans. , 1984, Cancer research.

[5]  A. D. Schryver The Stockholm breast cancer trial: preliminary report of a randomized study concerning the value of pre-operative or post-operative radiotherapy in operable disease. , 1976 .

[6]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[7]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[8]  W. Auffermann,et al.  Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy. , 1984, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[9]  T. Caspersson,et al.  DNA content and survival in mammary carcinoma. , 1980, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[10]  L. Freedman,et al.  Histological grade and other prognostic factors in relation to survival of patients with breast cancer. , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  Aneuploid DNA content and high S-phase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[12]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Comparative long-term prognostic value of quantitative HER-2/neu protein expression, DNA ploidy, and morphometric and clinical features in paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancer. , 1991, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Dna flow cytometry and pathologic grading as prognostic guides in axillary lymph node‐negative breast cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[15]  B. Stenkvist,et al.  Entropy as an algorithm for the statistical description of DNA cytometric data obtained by image analysis microscopy. , 1990, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[16]  M Aubele,et al.  Interactive cytometry, chance or evil of bias? , 1992, Pathology, research and practice.

[17]  D. Komitowski,et al.  Chromatin organization and breast cancer prognosis. Two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional image analysis , 1993, Cancer.

[18]  H. Joensuu,et al.  Prognosis of breast cancer with small primary tumor (pT1). , 1991, Acta oncologica.

[19]  G. Auer,et al.  Prognostic significance of dna measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients , 1988, Cancer.

[20]  G. Brugal,et al.  Cytometry of breast carcinoma: significance of ploïdy balance and proliferation index. , 1987, Cytometry.

[21]  E. Jarasch,et al.  Quantitative aspects in defining prognostic factors of breast cancer. , 1989, Pathology, Research and Practice.

[22]  H. Johnson,et al.  Prognostic significance of dna measurement determined by image analysis in human breast carcinoma , 1992, Journal of surgical oncology.

[23]  K Rodenacker Invariance of textural features in image cytometry under variation of size and pixel magnitude. , 1995, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[24]  R. Blamey,et al.  A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[26]  J. Baak,et al.  The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer , 1985, Cancer.

[27]  Ewert Bengtsson,et al.  Tuning Of An Interactive Software System For Image Analysis To Quantitative Microscopy. , 1982 .

[28]  Donald E. Henson,et al.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases , 1989 .

[29]  N. Sneige,et al.  Flow cytometric (DNA content and S‐phase fraction) analysis of breast cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[30]  G. Auer,et al.  Predictive value of nuclear DNA content in breast cancer in relation to clinical and morphologic factors. A retrospective study of 227 consecutive cases , 1988, Cancer.

[31]  D Komitowski,et al.  Quantitative features of chromatin structure in the prognosis of breast cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[32]  J. Baak,et al.  Limited prognostic value of cellular DNA content to classical and morphometrical parameters in invasive ductal breast cancer. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  M Oberholzer,et al.  Cytometry in histological sections of colon carcinoma. , 1992, Pathology, research and practice.

[34]  D. Schaid,et al.  DNA ploidy and percent S-phase as prognostic factors in node-positive breast cancer: results from patients enrolled in two prospective randomized trials. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  M. Fernö,et al.  Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry. , 1992, Cytometry.