Delayed interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis.

BACKGROUND Suboptimal triage of critically ill patients with surgical sepsis may contribute to adverse outcomes. Patients transferred to a tertiary care center after spending 24 hours or longer at an outside facility were compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center with the null hypothesis that management parameters and outcomes would be similar between groups. METHODS This prospective observational cohort study included 308 patients treated for surgical sepsis in a surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary care center. Patients transferred after spending more than 24 hours at an outside facility (n = 69) were compared with patients who were directly admitted or transferred within 24 hours (n = 239). Patient characteristics, management parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02276066). RESULTS Average outside facility length of stay in the delayed transfer group was 43 hours. Delayed transfer patients had higher sequential organ failure assessment (7 vs. 5, p = 0.003) and APACHE II scores (19 vs. 16, p = 0.007) on admission. The interval between admission and source control was significantly longer in the delayed transfer group (12.1 hours vs. 1.0 hours, p = 0.009). The incidence of nosocomial infection was significantly higher in the delayed transfer group (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.005). Delayed transfer was independently associated with a 10-day increase in hospital length of stay. Delayed transfer patients were less likely to be discharged home (22% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and suffered twofold higher in-hospital mortality (14.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION Patients with surgical sepsis who spent more than 24 hours at an outside facility prior to transfer had greater initial illness severity, longer intervals between admission and source control, and more nosocomial infections compared with patients who had early triage to a tertiary care center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Care management/therapeutic, Level IV; Epidemiologic/prognostic, Level III.

[1]  A. Bernard,et al.  ESCALATION OF MORTALITY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN EMERGENCY GENERAL SURGERY TRANSFER PATIENTS. , 2019, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[2]  Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz,et al.  Transferred Emergency General Surgery Patients Are at Increased Risk of Death: A NSQIP Propensity Score Matched Analysis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  B. Matthews,et al.  Interhospital transfer for emergency general surgery: An independent predictor of mortality. , 2018, American journal of surgery.

[4]  K. Davis,et al.  Transfer status: A significant risk factor for mortality in emergency general surgery patients requiring colon resection , 2018, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[5]  P. Efron,et al.  Effect of Time to Operation on Value of Care in Acute Care Surgery , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[6]  B. Brumback,et al.  Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center investigators: protocols and standard operating procedures for a prospective cohort study of sepsis in critically ill surgical patients , 2017, BMJ Open.

[7]  J. Torner,et al.  Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach. , 2016, Journal of critical care.

[8]  T. Scalea,et al.  Critical Care Resuscitation Unit: An Innovative Solution to Expedite Transfer of Patients with Time-Sensitive Critical Illness. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  S. Krajicek.  Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock; A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2016 .

[10]  N. Mohr,et al.  Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[11]  Michael Bailey,et al.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Gabrielli,et al.  Computer versus paper system for recognition and management of sepsis in surgical intensive care , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[13]  C. Torio,et al.  National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2011 , 2013 .

[14]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock 2012 , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[15]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[17]  Cheng Cheng Tan,et al.  Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Alan S. Go,et al.  Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[20]  Donald B. Chalfin,et al.  Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit* , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[21]  J. Vincent,et al.  A ‘Shock Room’ for Early Management of the Acutely Ill , 2006, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[22]  J. Gardner-Thorpe,et al.  The value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in surgical in-patients: a prospective observational study. , 2006, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[23]  C. Coopersmith,et al.  The systemic inflammatory response syndrome. , 2006, Microbes and infection.

[24]  M. Levy,et al.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference , 2003, Intensive care medicine.

[25]  Mitchell M. Levy,et al.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[26]  P. Myles,et al.  Outcome of emergency department patients with delayed admission to an intensive care unit. , 2002, Emergency medicine.

[27]  G. Clermont,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[28]  R. Wenzel,et al.  Septic shock: an analysis of outcomes for patients with onset on hospital wards versus intensive care units. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[29]  M. Davies,et al.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[30]  M. Haupt,et al.  Impact of critical care physician staffing on patients with septic shock in a university hospital medical intensive care unit. , 1988, JAMA.

[31]  B. Gersh,et al.  Population Trends in the Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011 .

[32]  CM Torio,et al.  National Inpatient Hospital Costs: The Most Expensive Conditions by Payer, 2013: Statistical Brief #204 , 2006 .