Biophysical controls of carbon flows in three successional Douglas-fir stands based on eddy-covariance measurements.

We measured net carbon flux (F(CO2)) and net H2O flux (F(H2O)) by the eddy-covariance method at three Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco)-western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) sites located in the Wind River Valley of southern Washington State, USA. Stands were approximately 20, 40 and 450 years old and measurements were made between June 15 and October 15 of 1998 in the 40- and 450-year-old stands, and of 1999 in the 20- and 450-year-old stands. Our objectives were to determine if there were differences among the stands in: (1) patterns of daytime F(CO2) during summer and early autumn; (2) empirically modeled relationships between local climatic factors (e.g., light, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil water content, temperature and net radiation) and daytime F(CO2); and (3) water-use efficiency (WUE). We used the Landsberg equation, a logarithmic power function and linear regression to model relationships between F(CO2) and physical variables. Overall, given the same irradiance, F(CO2) was 1.0-3.9 mol m-2 s-1 higher (P < 0.0001 for both seasons) at the two young stands than at the old-growth stand. During summer and early autumn, F(CO2) averaged 4.2 and 6.1 mol m-2 s-1 at the 20- and 40-year-old stand, respectively. In contrast, the 450-year-old forest averaged 2.2 and 3.2 mol m-2 s-1 in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Increases in VPD were associated with reduced F(CO2) at all three stands, with the greatest apparent constraints occurring at the old-growth stand. Correlations between F(CO2) and all other environmental variables differed among ecosystems, with soil temperature showing a negative correlation and net radiation showing a positive correlation. In the old-growth stand, WUE was significantly greater (P < 0.0001) in the drier summer of 1998 (2.7 mg g-1) than in 1999 (1.0 mg g-1). Although we did not use replicates in our study, the results indicate that there are large differences in F(CO2) among Douglas-fir stands of different ages growing in the same general area, and that variations in age structure and site conditions need to be considered when scaling flux measurements from individual points to the landscape level.

[1]  A. Arneth,et al.  Forest–atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange in eastern Siberia , 1998 .

[2]  David Y. Hollinger,et al.  Carbon dioxide exchange between an undisturbed old-growth temperate forest and the atmosphere , 1994 .

[3]  Xuhui Lee,et al.  On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation , 1998 .

[4]  J. Landsberg.  Some Useful Equations for Biological Studies , 1977, Experimental Agriculture.

[5]  J. Harborne.  Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New series , 1978 .

[6]  M. R. Spiegel.  E and M , 1981 .

[7]  P. Reich,et al.  Extrapolating leaf CO2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis compared with measurements by eddy correlation , 1996, Oecologia.

[8]  N. Buchmann,et al.  Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Peter D. Blanken,et al.  Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest , 1996 .

[10]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Net CO2 and H2O fluxes of terrestrial ecosystems , 1999 .

[11]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Strategies for measuring and modelling carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes over terrestrial ecosystems , 1996 .

[12]  S. Running,et al.  Satellite monitoring of global land cover changes and their impact on climate , 1995 .

[13]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[14]  Geoffrey G Parker,et al.  Canopy light transmittance in Douglas-fir--western hemlock stands. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[15]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS OVER NET EXCHANGES OF CARBON DIOXIDE FROM CONTRASTING FLORIDA ECOSYSTEMS , 1999 .

[16]  B. Bond,et al.  Aging in Pacific Northwest forests: a selection of recent research. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[17]  William E. Winner,et al.  Leaf area index of an old-growth Douglas-fir forest estimated from direct structural measurements in the canopy , 2000 .

[18]  Ray Leuning,et al.  The relative merits of open‐ and closed‐path analysers for measurement of eddy fluxes , 1996 .

[19]  N. McDowell,et al.  Use of a physiological process model with forestry yield tables to set limits on annual carbon balances. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[20]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, U.S.A. , 1995 .

[21]  B. Bond.  Age-related changes in photosynthesis of woody plants. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[22]  J. Berry,et al.  Responses of macrophytes to temperature , 1981 .

[23]  A. Arneth,et al.  Net ecosystem productivity, net primary productivity and ecosystem carbon sequestration in a Pinus radiata plantation subject to soil water deficit. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[24]  M. Harmon,et al.  Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests , 1990, Science.

[25]  H. Tian,et al.  The contribution of increasing CO 2 and climate to carbon storage by natural and agricultural ecosystems of the US 1980-1993 , 2001 .

[26]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[27]  M. Harmon,et al.  Successional changes in live and dead wood carbon stores: implications for net ecosystem productivity. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[28]  J. Klopatek.  Belowground carbon pools and processes in different age stands of Douglas-fir. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[29]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Evidence of Reduced Photosynthetic Rates in Old Trees , 1994, Forest Science.

[30]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests , 2000, Nature.

[31]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Monitoring global change: Comparison of forest cover estimates using remote sensing and inventory approaches , 1993, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[32]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Scaling gross ecosystem production at Harvard Forest with remote sensing: a comparison of estimates from a constrained quantum‐use efficiency model and eddy correlation , 1995 .

[33]  G. Mroz,et al.  Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology , 1999 .

[34]  J. E. Hunt,et al.  Commentary: Carbon Metabolism of the Terrestrial Biosphere: A Multitechnique Approach for Improved Understanding , 2000, Ecosystems.

[35]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[36]  J. William Munger,et al.  Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy , 1996 .

[37]  Christian Wirth,et al.  Managing Forests After Kyoto , 2000, Science.

[38]  John Moncrieff,et al.  Eddy-covariance CO2 flux measurements using open- and closed-path CO2 analysers: Corrections for analyser water vapour sensitivity and damping of fluctuations in air sampling tubes , 1990 .

[39]  T. Meyers,et al.  Correction Of Eddy-Covariance Measurements Incorporating Both Advective Effects And Density Fluxes , 2000, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.