Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Purpose Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a minimally invasive partial corneal transplant procedure used in patients with failing endothelial membranes. This study aims to identify those factors which influence the need for a rebubble of the corneal graft. Methods A total of 94 eyes that received DMEK between March 2014 and January 2016 at Vance Thompson Vision were used in the study. Demographic and graft data were collected from the patients and donors, and perioperative statistics of the procedures. A logistical regression was used to compare eyes that did and did not require a rebubble. Results Among those characteristics that were included (patient age/sex, donor age/sex, death to processing time, donation to surgery time, death to procurement time, specular cell count density, burping procedure, postoperative day 1 intraocular pressure [IOP], and postoperative week 1 IOP, concurrent phacoemulsification, and how well the Descemet graft was centered), only a lower specular cell count density of the corneal graft, and a graft that was not well-centered correlated with needing a rebubble due to partial graft detachment (p=0.021) and (p=0.023), respectively. Conclusion An increased specular cell count density may allow for better placement of the corneal graft by allowing for better unfolding in DMEK procedures. A well-centered graft may decrease postoperative complications by increasing adherence. Additionally, postoperative management of IOP may not affect the rebubble rate, and therefore should be left to the discretion of the provider to determine whether it is necessary.

[1]  Daniel Pilger,et al.  Rebubbling in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Influence of Pressure and Duration of the Intracameral Air Tamponade. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  F. Kruse,et al.  Role of Initial Intraocular Pressure in Graft Adhesion After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[3]  C. Murphy,et al.  Biomechanical relationships between the corneal endothelium and Descemet's membrane. , 2016, Experimental eye research.

[4]  A. Joussen,et al.  Rate and Localization of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[5]  T. Dietlein,et al.  Immediate Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes After Anterior Chamber Air Fill in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[6]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Association Between Graft Storage Time and Donor Age With Endothelial Cell Density and Graft Adherence After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, JAMA ophthalmology.

[7]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[8]  V. Borderie,et al.  Endothelial Survival After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Effect of Surgical Indication and Graft Adherence Status. , 2015, JAMA ophthalmology.

[9]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  Standardized DMEK Technique: Reducing Complications Using Prestripped Tissue, Novel Glass Injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas , 2015, Cornea.

[10]  T. Röck,et al.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[11]  A. Joussen,et al.  Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[12]  U. Pleyer,et al.  Clinicopathology of graft detachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[13]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Safety of donor tissue preparation and use of descemetoschisis and torn tissue in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2014, Cornea.

[14]  Silke Oellerich,et al.  Endothelial cell changes as an indicator for upcoming allograft rejection following descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Influence of Donor Characteristics on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2014, Cornea.

[16]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Gorovoy DMEK Complications , 2014, Cornea.

[18]  I. Dapena,et al.  Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[19]  F. Kruse,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[21]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[22]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Melles,et al.  Causes of primary donor failure in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[25]  G. Melles Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. , 2006, Cornea.

[26]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.

[27]  S. Wilson,et al.  Fuchs' dystrophy. , 1988, Cornea.

[28]  D. Maurice The location of the fluid pump in the cornea , 1972, The Journal of physiology.