Controlling practical stability and safety of mechanical systems by exploiting chaos properties.

In this paper, a method for controlling the global nonlinear dynamics of mechanical systems is applied to two models: the model of Augusti and an inverted guyed pendulum. These simplified models represent a large class of structures liable to buckling exhibiting interacting buckling phenomena. These structures may fail at load levels well below the theoretical buckling load due to complex nonlinear phenomena that decrease the safety and the dynamic integrity of the structure; this often occur as a consequence of imperfections and of the erosion of the basins of attraction of the safe pre-buckling solutions. So, it is of paramount practical importance to increase the safety of these structures in a dynamic environment. This can be achieved by increasing the integrity of the basins of attraction of the safe solutions, a goal that is attained by a control method which consists of the (optimal) elimination of homoclinic (or heteroclinic) intersection by properly adding superharmonic terms to a given harmonic excitation. By means of the solution of an appropriate optimization problem, it is possible to select the amplitudes and the phases of the added superharmonics in such a way that the manifolds distance is as large as possible. The results show that this methodology increases the integrity of the basins of attraction of the system and, consequently, the practical safety of the structure.

[1]  Paulo B. Gonçalves,et al.  Controlling Nonlinear Dynamics of Systems Liable to Unstable Interactive Buckling , 2012 .

[2]  Paulo B. Gonçalves,et al.  Influence of Uncertainties on the Dynamic Buckling Loads of Structures Liable to Asymmetric Postbuckling Behavior , 2008 .

[3]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  A Procedure for Reducing the Chaotic Response Region in an Impact Mechanical System , 1998 .

[4]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Load carrying capacity of systems within a global safety perspective. Part I. Robustness of stable equilibria under imperfections , 2011 .

[5]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Controlling nonlinear dynamics in a two-well impact system. II. Attractors and bifurcation scenario under unsymmetric optimal excitation , 1998 .

[6]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Load carrying capacity of systems within a global safety perspective. Part II. Attractor/basin integrity under dynamic excitations , 2011 .

[7]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Optimal Control of Homoclinic Bifurcation: Theoretical Treatment and Practical Reduction of Safe Basin Erosion in the Helmholtz Oscillator , 2003 .

[8]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  A unified control framework of the non-regular dynamics of mechanical oscillators , 2004 .

[9]  Paulo B. Gonçalves,et al.  Influence of modal coupling on the nonlinear dynamics of Augusti's model , 2009 .

[10]  STEFANO LENCI,et al.  Heteroclinic bifurcations and Optimal Control in the Nonlinear Rocking Dynamics of Generic and Slender Rigid Blocks , 2005, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[11]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Dynamical Integrity and Control of Nonlinear Mechanical Oscillators , 2008 .

[12]  S. Shaw.  The Supression of Chaos in Periodically Forced Oscillators , 1990 .

[13]  J. M. T. Thompson,et al.  A buckling model for the set of umbilic catastrophes , 1977, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Optimal Control of Nonregular Dynamics in a Duffing Oscillator , 2003 .

[15]  W. T. Koiter.  Over de stabiliteit van het elastisch evenwicht , 1945 .

[16]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN CONTROL OF COMPLEX DYNAMICS IN MECHANICAL AND STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[17]  W. T. Koiter.  THE STABILITY OF ELASTIC EQUILIBRIUM , 1970 .