Effects of a Multimedia Professional Development Package on Inclusive Science Teachers’ Vocabulary Instruction

Vocabulary knowledge is vital for students’ success in school and beyond. However, students with disabilities and others who consistently score below their peers on various measures of vocabulary knowledge have difficulties in secondary-level content area courses. Because many students with disabilities are now educated primarily in general education classrooms, their teachers report needing more professional development on instructional strategies to support this population. Using a multiple-baseline design, we tested the efficacy of a multimedia, multicomponent professional development package in which middle school science teachers in inclusive classrooms promoted science vocabulary knowledge. The professional development package improved the quality of the teachers’ use of evidence-based vocabulary practices and increased the amount of time they spent explicitly teaching vocabulary in their classes.

[1]  Barak Rosenshine,et al.  Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know. , 2012 .

[2]  D. Minner,et al.  Lesson Study for Accessible Science: Building Expertise to Improve Practice in Inclusive Science Classrooms. , 2012 .

[3]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation , 2007 .

[4]  Michael Solis,et al.  Special Education Teachers’ Perceptions and Instructional Practices in Response to Intervention Implementation , 2012 .

[5]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[6]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  Teachers’ Knowledge About Early Reading: Effects on Students’ Gains in Reading Achievement , 2011 .

[7]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  What We Know About Using Research Findings , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Wendy J. Rodgers,et al.  Innovations in the Delivery of Content Knowledge in Special Education Teacher Preparation , 2015 .

[9]  M. Hemmeter,et al.  Impact of Performance Feedback Delivered via Electronic Mail on Preschool Teachers' Use of Descriptive Praise. , 2011 .

[10]  William J. Therrien,et al.  Science Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta–Analysis , 2011 .

[11]  Paige C. Pullen,et al.  Improving instruction of future teachers: A multimedia approach that supports implementation of evidence-based vocabulary practices , 2014 .

[12]  M. Kennedy,et al.  Evaluating the Relationship Between Naturalistic Content Acquisition Podcast Views and Course Performance , 2016 .

[13]  J. Levin,et al.  Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[14]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  The Underlying Message in LD Intervention Research: Findings from Research Syntheses , 2000 .

[15]  Jan Eberhardt,et al.  Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development , 2011 .

[16]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Do Special Education Interventions Improve Learning of Secondary Content? A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  Lindsay M. Fallon,et al.  Is Performance Feedback for Educators an Evidence-Based Practice? A Systematic Review and Evaluation Based on Single-Case Research , 2015 .

[18]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .

[19]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  What Research Says about Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities , 2004 .

[20]  Nick Mitchell,et al.  The role of video in teacher professional development , 2014 .

[21]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Designs Technical Documentation. , 2010 .

[22]  A. Biemiller,et al.  Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. , 2001 .

[23]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices , 2004 .

[24]  H. Hill,et al.  Professional Development Research , 2013 .

[25]  E. Lembke,et al.  Using Content Acquisition Podcasts to Improve Teacher Candidate Knowledge of Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2016 .

[26]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[27]  J. Klingner,et al.  The Science of Professional Development , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[28]  Donald L. Compton,et al.  The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Passage-Level Comprehension of School-Age Children: A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[29]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement , 2005 .

[30]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[31]  C. Dede,et al.  A Research Agenda for Online Teacher Professional Development , 2009 .

[32]  Emily Ely,et al.  Improving teacher candidates' knowledge of phonological awareness: A multimedia approach , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Daniel C. Edelson,et al.  Comparing the Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development in the Context of Curriculum Implementation , 2013 .

[34]  Margaret R. Blanchard,et al.  Investigating Technology-Enhanced Teacher Professional Development in Rural, High-Poverty Middle Schools , 2016 .

[35]  Elizabeth A. Swanson.  Observing Reading Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis , 2008 .

[36]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  What Does It Mean To Create Sustainable Science Curriculum Innovations? A Commentary. , 2003 .

[37]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[38]  Jeanne R. Paratore,et al.  Vocabulary Instruction in Fifth Grade and Beyond , 2015 .

[39]  Wendy J. Rodgers,et al.  Supporting high school teachers' implementation of evidence-based classroom management practices , 2017 .

[40]  Donald D. Deshler,et al.  Effects of a Computerized Professional Development Program on Teacher and Student Outcomes , 2010 .

[41]  Erica S. Lembke,et al.  Implementation of Evidence-Based Literacy Practices in Middle School Response to Intervention , 2016 .

[42]  P. David Pearson,et al.  The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms , 2012 .

[43]  D. Cohen,et al.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works , 2001 .

[44]  Stephen Ciullo,et al.  Evaluating Reading and Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities , 2015 .

[45]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Constructing single-case research designs: Logic and options. , 2014 .

[46]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[47]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Research , 2003 .

[48]  Deborah K. Reed,et al.  The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and spelling to the reading comprehension of adolescents who are and are not English language learners , 2016, Reading and Writing.

[49]  Emily Ely,et al.  A Multimedia Tool to Deliver Professional Development of Vocabulary Instruction , 2015 .

[50]  H. Borko.  Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[51]  Debbie B. Golos,et al.  Teaching Reading in the 21st Century: A Glimpse at How Special Education Teachers Promote Reading Comprehension , 2010 .

[52]  Wendy J. Rodgers,et al.  A Multimedia Tool for Teacher Education and Professional Development , 2017 .

[53]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. , 2011, Behavior therapy.

[54]  Ryan O. Kellems,et al.  Using Enhanced Podcasts to Augment Limited Instructional Time in Teacher Preparation , 2011 .

[55]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .