Towards Explanatory Feedback for User Training in Brain-Computer Interfaces

Despite their potential for many applications, Brain -- Computer Interfaces (BCI) are still rarely used due to their low reliability and long training. These limitations are partly due to inappropriate training protocols, which includes the feedback provided to the user. While feedback should theoretically be explanatory, motivating and meaningful, current BCI feedback is usually boring, corrective only and difficult to understand. In this study, different features of the electroencephalogram signals were explored to be used as a richer, explanatory BCI feedback. First, based on offline mental imagery BCI data, muscular relaxation was notably found to be negatively correlated to BCI performance. Second, this study reports on an online BCI evaluation using muscular relaxation as additional feedback. While this additional feedback did not lead to significant change in BCI performance, this study showed that multiple feedbacks can be used without deteriorating performance and provided interesting insights for explanatory BCI feedback design.

[1]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  A comparison between auditory and visual feedback of sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) for a brain-computer interface (BCI) in healthy participants , 2006 .

[2]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  The predictive role of pre-cue EEG rhythms on MI-based BCI classification performance , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  Combining BCI with Virtual Reality: Towards New Applications and Improved BCI , 2012 .

[4]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Predicting Mental Imagery-Based BCI Performance from Personality, Cognitive Profile and Neurophysiological Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Jonathan R. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–Computer InterfacesPrinciples and Practice , 2012 .

[6]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Vibrotactile Feedback for Brain-Computer Interface Operation , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[7]  Roderick Murray-Smith,et al.  Visually Multimodal vs. Classic Unimodal Feedback Approach for SMR-BCIs: A Comparison Study , 2011 .

[8]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Peters,et al.  Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  M. Bergamasco,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for motor imagery for BCI under different sensory feedback conditions , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[11]  V. Shute Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  K. Müller,et al.  Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Han-Jeong Hwang,et al.  Neurofeedback-based motor imagery training for brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  C. Neuper,et al.  Whatever Works: A Systematic User-Centered Training Protocol to Optimize Brain-Computer Interfacing Individually , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Christian Mühl,et al.  Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous Brain-Computer Interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 2012 .

[18]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  A brain–computer interface based on self-regulation of gamma-oscillations in the superior parietal cortex , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Minkyu Ahn,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[20]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Girijesh Prasad,et al.  Is Sensorimotor BCI Performance Influenced Differently by Mono, Stereo, or 3-D Auditory Feedback? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[23]  Tonio Ball,et al.  Causal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging , 2015, NeuroImage.