Characterization and evaluation of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism

Data are presented on 97 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who constitute a representative cohort of the disease seen today. The average calcium (11.1 ± 0.1 mg/dl; normal 8.7–10.7), phosphorus (2.8 ± 0.1 mg/dl; normal 2.5–4.5), and parathyroid hormone level by immunoradiometric assay (119 ± 7 pg/ml; normal 10–65) are typical of the modern presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism. Most patients were asymptomatic in that there was evidence for nephrolithiasis in only 18% and for radiologically evident bone disease in only 1% of patients. Nevertheless, when patients were evaluated with bone densitometry and with histomorphometric analysis of the bone biopsy specimen, evidence for the hyperparathyroid process could be shown in the majority of patients. Selective reduction of cortical bone and preservation of cancellous bone were apparent. Among patients with nephrolithiasis, no particular feature distinguished them from patients without nephrolithiasis. All biochemical data were similar between both stone and non‐stone formers. The selective reduction in cortical bone was seen to the same extent among those with stones as among those without stones. The average 1,25‐dihydroxyvitamin D level was not increased among those with stones. When the population was divided into groups with elevated or normal 1,25‐dihydroxy vitamin D levels, the incidence of nephrolithiasis was unchanged. The results indicate that bone involvement can be demonstrated among most patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism and that no pathophysiologic mechanisms are yet apparent to account for nephrolithiasis in primary hyperparathyroidism.

[1]  T. Clemens,et al.  Nephrolithiasis and bone involvement in primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Lindsay,et al.  The histomorphometry of bone in primary hyperparathyroidism: preservation of cancellous bone structure. , 1990, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[3]  D. Dempster,et al.  Bone disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1990, Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America.

[4]  R. Lovelace,et al.  Neuromuscular involvement in mild, asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  T. Clemens,et al.  Skeletal disease in primary hyperparathyroidism , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Lack of biochemical progression or continuation of accelerated bone loss in mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: evidence for biphasic disease course. , 1988, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  W. Snyder,et al.  A lack of unique pathophysiologic background for nephrolithiasis of primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1981, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  H. Rasmussen,et al.  The importance of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in the pathogenesis of hypercalciuria and renal-stone formation in primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  W. Engel,et al.  Neuromuscular disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. , 1974, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  F. Albright,et al.  The Parathyriod Glands and Metabolic Bone Disease. , 1948 .

[11]  W. Bauer,et al.  HYPERPARATHYROIDISM: A COMMON AND POLYMORPHIC CONDITION AS ILLUSTRATED BY SEVENTEEN PROVED CASES FROM ONE CLINIC , 1934 .