Channel selection for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric prosthesis control of multiple degrees-of-freedom

OBJECTIVE Recent studies have shown the possibility of simultaneous and proportional control of electrically powered upper-limb prostheses, but there has been little investigation on optimal channel selection. The objective of this study is to find a robust channel selection method and the channel subsets most suitable for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric prosthesis control of multiple degrees-of-freedom (DoFs). APPROACH Ten able-bodied subjects and one person with congenital upper-limb deficiency took part in this study, and performed wrist movements with various combinations of two DoFs (flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation). During the experiment, high density electromyographic (EMG) signals and the actual wrist angles were recorded with an 8 × 24 electrode array and a motion tracking system, respectively. The wrist angles were estimated from EMG features with ridge regression using the subsets of channels chosen by three different channel selection methods: (1) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), (2) sequential feature selection (SFS), and (3) uniform selection (UNI). MAIN RESULTS SFS generally showed higher estimation accuracy than LASSO and UNI, but LASSO always outperformed SFS in terms of robustness, such as noise addition, channel shift and training data reduction. It was also confirmed that about 95% of the original performance obtained using all channels can be retained with only 12 bipolar channels individually selected by LASSO and SFS. SIGNIFICANCE From the analysis results, it can be concluded that LASSO is a promising channel selection method for accurate simultaneous and proportional prosthesis control. We expect that our results will provide a useful guideline to select optimal channel subsets when developing clinical myoelectric prosthesis control systems based on continuous movements with multiple DoFs.

[1]  Julien Mairal,et al.  Optimization with Sparsity-Inducing Penalties , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[2]  Dario Farina,et al.  Simultaneous and Proportional Force Estimation for Multifunction Myoelectric Prostheses Using Mirrored Bilateral Training , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Yanjuan Geng,et al.  Recognition of Combined Arm Motions Using Support Vector Machine , 2011 .

[4]  He Huang,et al.  An Analysis of EMG Electrode Configuration for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Based Neural Machine Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[6]  D. Farina,et al.  Simultaneous and Proportional Estimation of Hand Kinematics From EMG During Mirrored Movements at Multiple Degrees-of-Freedom , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Spatial Filtering for Robust Myoelectric Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R.N. Scott,et al.  Two-channel enhancement of a multifunction control system , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako,et al.  Real-Time, Simultaneous Myoelectric Control Using Force and Position-Based Training Paradigms , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  Myoelectric Control of Artificial Limbs¿Is There a Need to Change Focus? [In the Spotlight] , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[15]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[16]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Classification of Simultaneous Movements Using Surface EMG Pattern Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Guanglei Xiong,et al.  Current progress in 3D printing for cardiovascular tissue engineering , 2015, Biomedical materials.

[18]  A. Willsky,et al.  Upper Extremity Limb Function Discrimination Using EMG Signal Analysis , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Penalized least squares regression methods and applications to neuroimaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Decoding a new neural machine interface for control of artificial limbs. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Dario Farina,et al.  Simultaneous and proportional control of 2D wrist movements with myoelectric signals , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing.

[24]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[25]  K. Nazarpour,et al.  Surface EMG Signal Classification Using a Selective Mix of Higher Order Statistics , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[26]  Dario Farina,et al.  EMG-based simultaneous and proportional estimation of wrist/hand kinematics in uni-lateral trans-radial amputees , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[28]  Dario Farina,et al.  Effect of arm position on the prediction of kinematics from EMG in amputees , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[29]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  D. Farina,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Regression Techniques for Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  B. Hudgins,et al.  The effect of electrode displacements on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  Ferat Sahin,et al.  Pattern recognition with surface EMG signal based wavelet transformation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[33]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effects of Electrode Size and Orientation on the Sensitivity of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Systems to Electrode Shift , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.