Predicting delay factors when chipping wood at forest roadside landings

ABSTRACT Chipping of bulky biomass assortments at roadside landings is a common and costly step in the biomass-to-energy supply chain. This operation normally involves one chipping unit and one or several transport trucks working together for simultaneous chipping and chip transport to a terminal or end user. Reducing the delay factors in these operations is a relevant ambition for lowering supply costs. A method to estimate organizational delay based on: (1) the capacity ratio between the transport and the chipper, (2) the use of buffer storage, and (3) the number of transport units involved is suggested here. Other delays will also be present, and some of these may relate to the working conditions at the landing. A method to set a landing functionality index based on characteristics of the forest landing is also suggested. A total of 14 roadside chipping operations were assessed and the operators were interviewed to address the impact of machinery configuration and landing characteristics on machine utilization. At most sites, the chipper was the more productive part, and the chipper utilization was to a large extent limited by organizational delay. Still the utilization of the transport units varied between 37 and 97%, of which some 36% of the variation was explained by the landing functionality index. Knowledge from the work presented here should be a good starting point for improving biomass supply planning and supply chain configuration.

[1]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Effects of Sieve Size on Chipper Productivity, Fuel Consumption and Chip Size Distribution for Open Drum Chippers , 2015 .

[2]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping , 2010 .

[3]  Tapio Ranta,et al.  The profitability of transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland , 2006 .

[4]  Michael A. Thompson,et al.  AN INTERNATIONAL NOMENCLATURE FOR FOREST WORK STUDY , 2000 .

[5]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Chipping operations and efficiency in different operational environments. , 2012 .

[6]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Analysis of factors affecting productivity and costs for a high-performance chip supply system , 2017 .

[7]  D. Röser Operational efficiency of forest energy supply chains in different operational environments , 2012 .

[8]  Nils Egil Søvde Algorithms for estimating the suitability of potential landing sites , 2015, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[9]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .

[10]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Forest energy potential in Europe (EU 27) , 2008 .

[11]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Analyzing and Estimating Delays in Harvester Operations , 2008 .

[12]  Gianni Picchi,et al.  Chip truck utilization for a container handling chipper truck when chipping logging residues and the effect of two grapple types on chipping efficiency , 2015 .

[13]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Glossary of Terms Used in Timber Harvesting and Forest Engineering , 1989 .

[14]  Antti Asikainen,et al.  Simulation of stump crushing and truck transport of chips , 2010 .

[15]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  A survey of Italian chipping operations , 2001 .

[16]  A. Asikainen,et al.  Comminution of Logging Residues with Evolution 910R chipper, MOHA chipper truck, and Morbark 1200 tub grinder , 2013 .

[17]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of supply chains for stump fuel , 2014 .

[18]  Antti Asikainen Chipping terminal logistics , 1998 .

[19]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland , 2011 .

[20]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Characteristics of Swedish forest biomass terminals for energy , 2014 .

[21]  B. Talbot,et al.  Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies , 2012 .

[22]  I. Samset Some observations on time and performance studies in forestry , 1990 .