Structures of Cas9 Endonucleases Reveal RNA-Mediated Conformational Activation

Introduction Bacteria and archaea defend themselves against invasive DNA using adaptive immune systems comprising CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) loci and CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes. In association with Cas proteins, small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) guide the detection and cleavage of complementary DNA sequences. Type II CRISPR systems employ the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 to recognize and cleave double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) targets using conserved RuvC and HNH nuclease domains. Cas9-mediated cleavage is strictly dependent on the presence of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in the target DNA. Recently, the biochemical properties of Cas9–guide RNA complexes have been harnessed for various genetic engineering applications and RNA-guided transcriptional control. Despite these ongoing successes, the structural basis for guide RNA recognition and DNA targeting by Cas9 is still unknown. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. (A) Crystal structures of S. pyogenes (SpyCas9) and A. naeslundii (AnaCas9) Cas9 proteins. (B) Left: Negative-stain EM reconstructions of apo-SpyCas9 (top) and SpyCas9-RNA-target DNA complex (bottom) show that nucleic acid binding causes a reorientation of the nuclease (blue) and α-helical (gray) lobes in SpyCas9. Right: Cartoon representations of the structures. tracrRNA, trans-activating crRNA. Rationale To compare the architectures and domain organization of diverse Cas9 proteins, the atomic structures of Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpyCas) and Actinomyces naeslundii (AnaCas9) were determined by x-ray crystallography. Crosslinking of target DNA containing 5-bromodeoxyuridines was conducted to identify PAM-interacting regions in SpyCas9. To test functional interactions with nucleic acid ligands, structure-based mutant SpyCas9 proteins were assayed for endonuclease activity with radiolabeled oligonucleotide dsDNA targets, and target DNA binding was monitored by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. To compare conformations of Cas9 in different states of nucleic acid binding, three-dimensional reconstructions of apo-SpyCas9, SpyCas9:RNA, and SpyCas9:RNA:DNA were obtained by negative-stain single-particle electron microscopy. Guide RNA and target DNA positions were determined with streptavidin labeling. Exonuclease protection assays were carried out to determine the extent of Cas9–target DNA interactions. Results The 2.6 Å–resolution structure of apo-SpyCas9 reveals a bilobed architecture comprising a nuclease domain lobe and an α-helical lobe. Both lobes contain conserved clefts that may function in nucleic acid binding. Photocrosslinking experiments show that the PAM in target DNA is engaged by two tryptophan-containing flexible loops, and mutations of both loops impair target DNA binding and cleavage. The 2.2 Å–resolution crystal structure of AnaCas9 reveals the conserved structural core shared by all Cas9 enzyme subtypes, and both SpyCas9 and AnaCas9 adopt autoinhibited conformations in their apo forms. The electron microscopic (EM) reconstructions of SpyCas9:RNA and SpyCas9:RNA:DNA complexes reveal that guide RNA binding results in a conformational rearrangement and formation of a central channel for target DNA binding. Site-specific labeling of guide RNA and target DNA define the orientations of nucleic acids in the target-bound complex. Conclusion The SpyCas9 and AnaCas9 structures define the molecular architecture of the Cas9 enzyme family in which a conserved structural core encompasses the two nuclease domains responsible for DNA cleavage, while structurally divergent regions, including the PAM recognition loops, are likely responsible for distinct guide RNA and PAM specificities. Cas9 enzymes adopt a catalytically inactive conformation in the apo state, necessitating structural activation for DNA recognition and cleavage. Our EM analysis shows that by triggering a conformational rearrangement in Cas9, the guide RNA acts as a critical determinant of target DNA binding. Cas9 Solved Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–associated (Cas) loci allow prokaryotes to identify and destroy invading DNA. Not only important to bacteria, the universal value of Cas endonuclease specificity has also resulted in Cas9 being exploited as a tool for genome editing. Jinek et al. (10.1126/science.1247997, published online 6 February) determined the 2.6 and 2.2 angstrom resolution crystal structures of two Cas9 enzymes to reveal a common structural core with distinct peripheral elaborations. The enzymes are autoinhibited, undergo large conformational changes on binding RNA, and have channels lined with basic residues that are candidates for an RNA-DNA binding groove. Based on these and other insights from the structures, this work provides important revelations both for the CRISPR mechanism and for genome editing. Binding of a guide RNA triggers structural changes in a set of DNA-cleaving enzymes. Type II CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)–Cas (CRISPR-associated) systems use an RNA-guided DNA endonuclease, Cas9, to generate double-strand breaks in invasive DNA during an adaptive bacterial immune response. Cas9 has been harnessed as a powerful tool for genome editing and gene regulation in many eukaryotic organisms. We report 2.6 and 2.2 angstrom resolution crystal structures of two major Cas9 enzyme subtypes, revealing the structural core shared by all Cas9 family members. The architectures of Cas9 enzymes define nucleic acid binding clefts, and single-particle electron microscopy reconstructions show that the two structural lobes harboring these clefts undergo guide RNA–induced reorientation to form a central channel where DNA substrates are bound. The observation that extensive structural rearrangements occur before target DNA duplex binding implicates guide RNA loading as a key step in Cas9 activation.

[1]  A. Sobel,et al.  The Journal of Biological Chemistry. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[2]  Eric Blanc,et al.  Automated structure solution with autoSHARP. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[3]  Jennifer Doudna,et al.  RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells , 2013, eLife.

[4]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes , 2013, Cell.

[5]  R. Terns,et al.  CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems , 2011, Biology Direct.

[7]  C. Sander,et al.  Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  R. Barrangou,et al.  In vitro reconstitution of Cascade‐mediated CRISPR immunity in Streptococcus thermophilus , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[9]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[10]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs): the hallmark of an ingenious antiviral defense mechanism in prokaryotes , 2011, Biological chemistry.

[11]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[12]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[13]  Chengqi Yi,et al.  Crystal structures of DNA/RNA repair enzymes AlkB and ABH2 bound to dsDNA , 2008, Nature.

[14]  P. Chacón,et al.  Multi-resolution contour-based fitting of macromolecular structures. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[16]  Wei Yang,et al.  An equivalent metal ion in one- and two-metal-ion catalysis , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  Prashant Mali,et al.  Orthogonal Cas9 Proteins for RNA-Guided Gene Regulation and Editing , 2013, Nature Methods.

[18]  Christopher Irving,et al.  A toolbox for ab initio 3-D reconstructions in single-particle electron microscopy. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[19]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[20]  J. Doudna,et al.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Shirley Graham,et al.  Structure of the CRISPR Interference Complex CSM Reveals Key Similarities with Cascade , 2013, Molecular cell.

[23]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA , 2010, Nature.

[24]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  G. Church,et al.  Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology , 2013, Nature Methods.

[26]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Making and breaking nucleic acids: two-Mg2+-ion catalysis and substrate specificity. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[27]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published April 22, 2007 MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids , 2007 .

[28]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  RNA-guided complex from a bacterial immune system enhances target recognition through seed sequence interactions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  E. Bolt,et al.  Tuning in to interference: R-loops and cascade complexes in CRISPR immunity. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[31]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  MAFFT: iterative refinement and additional methods. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[32]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting Type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[33]  José María Carazo,et al.  Image processing for electron microscopy single-particle analysis using XMIPP , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[34]  Chao Yang,et al.  SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EM image processing. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[35]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[36]  G. Church,et al.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  S Birmanns,et al.  Using situs for flexible and rigid-body fitting of multiresolution single-molecule data. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[38]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Structures of the RNA-guided surveillance complex from a bacterial immune system , 2011, Nature.

[39]  David S. Weiss,et al.  A CRISPR-CAS System Mediates Bacterial Innate Immune Evasion and Virulence , 2013, Nature.

[40]  Thomas C Terwilliger,et al.  Automated structure solution, density modification and model building. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[41]  P. Roepstorff,et al.  Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. , 1984, Biomedical mass spectrometry.

[42]  Clinton S Potter,et al.  ACE: automated CTF estimation. , 2005, Ultramicroscopy.

[43]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  crRNA and tracrRNA guide Cas9-mediated DNA interference in Streptococcus thermophilus , 2013, RNA biology.

[44]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[46]  Peter S. Kutchukian,et al.  Enforced Presentation of an Extrahelical Guanine to the Lesion Recognition Pocket of Human 8-Oxoguanine Glycosylase, hOGG1* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  M. Nowotny,et al.  Crystal structure of RuvC resolvase in complex with Holliday junction substrate , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[49]  Wei Yang,et al.  Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism , 2010, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[50]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[51]  Thomas D. Goddard,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cryo-EM density map segmentation by watershed and scale-space filtering, and fitting of structures by alignment to regions. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[52]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[53]  Gregory L. Verdine,et al.  Encounter and extrusion of an intrahelical lesion by a DNA repair enzyme , 2009, Nature.

[54]  Christopher Irving,et al.  Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[55]  George M Sheldrick,et al.  Substructure solution with SHELXD. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[56]  K. Severinov,et al.  Analysis of CRISPR system function in plant pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae. , 2009, FEMS microbiology letters.

[57]  Jörg Vogel,et al.  Processing-independent CRISPR RNAs limit natural transformation in Neisseria meningitidis. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[58]  Thomas Terwilliger,et al.  SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. , 2004, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[59]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[60]  References , 1971 .

[61]  Tal Pupko,et al.  ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[62]  Emmanuelle Charpentier,et al.  The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems , 2013, RNA biology.

[63]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[64]  Anchi Cheng,et al.  Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[65]  D. Patel,et al.  Structure of DNMT1-DNA Complex Reveals a Role for Autoinhibition in Maintenance DNA Methylation , 2011, Science.

[66]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[67]  Nicholas E. Propson,et al.  Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  P. Evans,et al.  Scaling and assessment of data quality. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[69]  K. Zhou,et al.  Structural basis for DNase activity of a conserved protein implicated in CRISPR-mediated genome defense. , 2009, Structure.

[70]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[71]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[72]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[73]  Markus Landthaler,et al.  DNA binding and cleavage by the HNH homing endonuclease I-HmuI. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  J. Berger,et al.  Structure and mechanism of DNA topoisomerase II , 1996, Nature.

[75]  A M Roseman,et al.  FindEM--a fast, efficient program for automatic selection of particles from electron micrographs. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[76]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[77]  Dipali G. Sashital,et al.  Mechanism of foreign DNA selection in a bacterial adaptive immune system. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[78]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Wen Jiang,et al.  EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[80]  P. Zwart,et al.  Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine , 2012, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[81]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[82]  Patrice Gouet,et al.  ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript , 1999, Bioinform..

[83]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[84]  M van Heel,et al.  A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[85]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[86]  J. Frank,et al.  Three‐dimensional reconstruction from a single‐exposure, random conical tilt series applied to the 50S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[87]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[88]  Michael S. Spilman,et al.  Structure of an RNA silencing complex of the CRISPR-Cas immune system. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[89]  A. Leslie,et al.  Autoindexing diffraction images with iMosflm , 2013, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[90]  M Radermacher,et al.  DoG Picker and TiltPicker: software tools to facilitate particle selection in single particle electron microscopy. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[91]  Randy J Read,et al.  Automated structure solution with the PHENIX suite. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.