Ecological genomics: making the leap from model systems in the lab to native populations in the field

Recent reviews have emphasized the need to incorporate genomics into ecological field studies to further understand how species respond to changing environmental conditions. Genomic tools, such as cDNA (complementary DNA) microarrays, allow for the simultaneous analysis of gene expression of thousands of genes from all or part of an organism's genome (the transcription profile), thereby revealing the genetic mechanisms that underlie species' responses to environmental change. However, despite their potential, two major limitations have hindered the incorporation of microarrays and other genomic tools into field studies: (1) the limited availability of microarrays for ecologically relevant, non-model species and limited financial resources for developing new microarrays; and (2) concern that high sensitivity of gene expression to even subtle alterations in environmental conditions will hinder detection of relevant changes in field measures of transcription profiles. Here, we show that with cross-species hy...

[1]  Günter Kahl,et al.  SuperSAGE array: the direct use of 26-base-pair transcript tags in oligonucleotide arrays , 2006, Nature Methods.

[2]  Michael F. Thomashow,et al.  Arabidopsis transcription factors regulating cold acclimation , 2006 .

[3]  K. Garrett,et al.  Ecological Genomics and Epidemiology , 2006, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[4]  H. Bohnert,et al.  Salinity stress adaptation competence in the extremophile Thellungiella halophila in comparison with its relative Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2005, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[5]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Utilization of tomato microarrays for comparative gene expression analysis in the Solanaceae. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  C. Primmer,et al.  Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[7]  G. Hofmann,et al.  Genomics-fueled approaches to current challenges in marine ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Mark G. M. Aarts,et al.  Transcription Profiling of the Metal-hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens (J. & C. PRESL) , 2005, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences.

[9]  John Vontas,et al.  The Anopheles gambiae detoxification chip: a highly specific microarray to study metabolic-based insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  T. Hartung,et al.  Innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana: lipopolysaccharides activate nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and induce defense genes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Galbraith,et al.  Temporal progression of gene expression responses to salt shock in maize roots , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[12]  M. Feder,et al.  Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Knapp,et al.  Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non‐random species loss , 2003 .

[15]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Merging Ecology, Molecular Evolution, and Functional Genetics , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[16]  A. Darvasi.  Genomics: Gene expression meets genetics , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Patrick S Schnable,et al.  Laser-capture microdissection, a tool for the global analysis of gene expression in specific plant cell types: identification of genes expressed differentially in epidermal cells or vascular tissues of maize. , 2003, The Plant cell.

[18]  J. Blair,et al.  Rainfall Variability, Carbon Cycling, and Plant Species Diversity in a Mesic Grassland , 2002, Science.

[19]  G. Churchill,et al.  Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[20]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Linking molecular insight and ecological research , 2002 .

[21]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[22]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Altered Rainfall Patterns, Gas Exchange, and Growth in Grasses and Forbs , 2002, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[23]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[24]  Hong Wang,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles during the Initial Phase of Salt Stress in Rice , 2001, Plant Cell.

[25]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[26]  S. Heckathorn,et al.  The contribution of drought‐related decreases in foliar nitrogen concentration to decreases in photosynthetic capacity during and after drought in prairie grasses , 1997 .